• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • msnbc.com sites & shows:
  • TODAY
  • Rock Center
  • Nightly News
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • Morning Joe
  • Hardball
  • Ed
  • Maddow
  • Last Word
  • msnbc tv
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech & science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Veteran fights VA to keep PTSD diagnosis
  • Recommended: Grandmother charged with murder after allegedly shooting grandson eight times
  • Recommended: Sierra LaMar's parents hold out hope even as cops arrest murder suspect
  • Recommended: Mississippi pastor-lawmaker denies endorsing the killing of gays
Msnbc.com reporters and NBC correspondents bring you compelling stories from across the nation. For more U.S. news, follow us on Twitter and Facebook.
  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 1
    day
    ago

    Lobbying continues at the Obama White House, visitor logs show

    By Bill Dedman, Investigative Reporter, msnbc.com

    The Washington Post has an excellent look at visits by lobbyists to senior officials in the Obama administration, based on White House visitor records. An excerpt:

    More than any president before him, Obama pledged to change the political culture that has fueled the influence of lobbyists. He barred recent lobbyists from joining his administration and banned them from advisory boards throughout the executive branch. The president went so far as to forbid what had been staples of political interaction — federal employees could no longer accept free admission to receptions and conferences sponsored by lobbying groups.

    "A lot of folks," Obama said last month, "see the amounts of money that are being spent and the special interests that dominate and the lobbyists that always have access, and they say to themselves, maybe I don’t count."

    The White House visitor records make it clear that Obama’s senior officials are granting that access to some of K Street’s most influential representatives. In many cases, those lobbyists have long-standing connections to the president or his aides. Republican lobbyists coming to visit are rare, while Democratic lobbyists are common, whether they are representing corporate clients or liberal causes. 

    Is lobbying greater under Obama than under his predecessors? It's impossible to know, because President Obama is the first president to release records of White House visitors. Score one for transparency, and score one for the lobbyists, too.

    You may recall that msnbc.com covered the issue of White House visitor logs, pressing repeatedly for the White House to release all the records. That still hasn't happened. Records of visitors for the first eight months of the Obama presidency have not been released.


    Here's the Post story, by reporter T.W. Farnam 

     

    You can search for names of visitors

    The Obama administration released records to settle a lawsuit, and another lawsuit is pending to try to force the White House to release all the records. The president's attorneys continue to make the claim, as previous administrations had made, that the records are not covered under the Freedom of Information Act, despite two federal court decisions calling for all the records to be released. So the disclosures made so far are, in the White House view, voluntary. Presumed Republican nominee Mitt Romney has not said whether he will release White House visitor logs.

    Stories in our msnbc.com series on the White House visitor logs:

    • Obama blocks list of visitors to White House
    • After lawsuit, Obama opens a bit of info on meetings with health care executives.
    • Obama yields on most White House visitor logs
    • Help figure out who has been lobbying Obama
    • Obama names 110 White House visitors
    • Obama is sued for White House visitor list

    Submit ideas Share your story ideas or documents with Open Channel

    Facebook Follow Bill Dedman on Facebook

    Facebook Follow Open Channel on Facebook

    Twitter Follow Bill Dedman on Twitter

    Twitter Follow Open Channel on Twitter

    E-mail alerts Sign up for e-mail alerts

    45 comments

    Did anyone really think Obama was going to tell you the truth? He is just as corrupt as any of them. Transparency my ass in the White House/goverrnment! Lobbying is as bad a ever! Just wait till Obama hosts the first Gay Marriage at the White House! Washington is worse than ever. Our politicians …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: white-house, lobbying, obama, disclosure, featured
  • 7
    days
    ago

    Critics denounce Virginia lawmakers' rejection of gay judicial nominee

     

    By msnbc.com news services

    Critics denounced a vote Tuesday by Virginia lawmakers rejecting a gay prosecutor for a judgeship in the state’s capital, saying the representatives were on the “wrong side of history” and pushing a “form of bigotry,” according to local local media reports.

    Tracy Thorne-Begland, a prosecutor for 12 years in General District Court in Richmond, was the only one of more than three dozen judicial nominees who failed to win approval from the House of Delegates, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported. The final tally was 33 for and 31 against, while 36 either didn’t vote or abstained. Fifty-one votes were needed to approve.


    Thorne-Begland’s nomination for the bench in the same court where he was a prosecutor came under scrutiny last week after the Family Foundation of Virginia, Republican Delegate Robert G. Marshall and others said they opposed his nomination because of his candor on gay rights. They said they didn’t object to him because of his sexuality, The Washington Post reported.

    “He holds himself out as being married,” Marshall said, according to the Post. In Virginia, where gay marriage is not legal, he said Thorne-Begland’s “life is a contradiction to the requirement of submission to the (state) Constitution.”

    But Richmond Commonwealth's Attorney Michael N. Herring described the decision as an “embarrassment” for Virginia that cast “a definite pall on the state,” and said Thorne-Begland would have done a great job.

    “It's hard to think about what happened in the General Assembly and not conclude that it's a form of bigotry,” Herring told reporters, the Times-Dispatch reported.

    "We are on the wrong side of history," said Democratic Sen. A. Donald McEachin, of the rejection. "This is not our finest hour."

    Thorne-Begland told the Times-Dispatch after the vote: "I look forward to continuing to serve the citizens of the city of Richmond and the great Commonwealth of Virginia."

    Thorne-Begland announced he was a gay Navy officer some two decades ago on the television program “Nightline.” That led to an  honorable discharge for the decorated officer under the military's former "don't ask, don't tell," policy, according to the Times-Dispatch.

    That policy, repealed in 2010, banned gay men and women from serving openly in the military.

    The Virginia assembly’s decision came a week after North Carolina voting down gay marriage while President Barack Obama became the country’s first president to support same-sex unions. A Gallup poll released last Tuesday found that 50 percent of Americans supported same-sex marriage while 48 percent were opposed. It was the second time that at least half of Americans had backed same-sex marriage.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Catholic college drops student health insurance, cites birth control mandate
    • Cities struggle to keep Memorial Day, Fourth of July celebrations
    • F-22 flights restricted due to oxygen system complaints
    • Video: Brutal violence escalates in Mexico drug wars
    • Marines sold stolen combat weapons to gangs, China
    • Fire captain demoted for Trayvon Martin Facebook post

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    152 comments

    So much for the "Virginia is for Lovers" slogan. The Republicans have changed it to "Virginia is for Haters".

    Show more
    Explore related topics: obama, gay, marriage, poll, virginia, north, judge, carolina, same-sex
  • 7
    days
    ago

    Franciscan University drops student health insurance plan over birth control mandate, costs

    By msnbc.com staff and news services

    The Franciscan University of Steubenville in Ohio will drop health insurance coverage for students this fall rather than comply with a federal mandate that its plan provide free birth control.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    University officials on Tuesday also cited rising insurance costs for their decision to end student health coverage.

    “The Obama Administration has mandated that all health insurance plans must cover ‘women’s health services’ including contraception, sterilization, and abortion-causing medications as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA),” according to a university statement. “Up to this time, Franciscan University has specifically excluded these services and products from its student health insurance policy, and we will not participate in a plan that requires us to violate the consistent teachings of the Catholic Church on the sacredness of human life.”


    “Additionally, the PPACA increased the mandated maximum coverage amount for student policies to $100,000 for the 2012-13 school year, which would effectively double your premium cost for the policy in fall 2012, with the expectation of further increases in the future,” the statement said.

    The university will no longer require its undergraduates to carry insurance, according to the statement. "We didn't want to put them in a situation where they would have to violate their conscience," Michael Hernon, a vice president at Franciscan University, told Reuters.

    Fewer than 200 students at the campus in southeast Ohio had been buying insurance from the university, Hernon told Reuters. Franciscan University has nearly 2,800 students.

    Watch the Top Videos on msnbc.com

    Earlier this year, the Franciscan was among 18 Catholic colleges in a letter-writing campaign, calling for President Barack Obama to change the government's mandate for religious institutions to offer preventative care services, including contraceptives. Churches and houses of worship are exempt from the rule. 

    Several Catholic and evangelical Christian universities have challenged the contraceptive mandate in court. Those cases have not yet come to trial. Hernon told Reuters that the university is weighing a lawsuit.

    With the new health insurance year set to start in August, however, administrators at Franciscan University chose not to wait for the court's ruling. In addition to the contraception mandate, they said they were concerned that premiums for the student plan would rise because the Affordable Care Act also mandates other specific services be covered.

    So the bulletin advised students that they should begin to figure out their insurance plans.

    "We encourage you to decide how you are going to provide for accidents or illnesses requiring visits to physicians, health clinics, or the hospital emergency room while you are a student here," the announcement said.

    The university will maintain its health insurance plan for faculty, for now. That plan does not cover birth control. Hernon said administrators are "looking at all the options" as they decide how, or whether, to continue the plan in the future if the contraceptive mandate is upheld.

    The university, which was founded 60 years ago to serve World War Two veterans, is ranked as one of the top-tier private colleges in the Midwest. It boasts on its website that its academics and culture are "grounded in a passionately Catholic faith tradition."

    Msnbc.com's Sevil Omer and Reuters' Stephanie Simon contributed to this report.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Catholic college drops student health insurance, cites birth control mandate
    • Cities struggle to keep Memorial Day, Fourth of July celebrations
    • F-22 flights restricted due to oxygen system complaints
    • Video: Brutal violence escalates in Mexico drug wars
    • Marines sold stolen combat weapons to gangs, China
    • Fire captain demoted for Trayvon Martin Facebook post

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    318 comments

    Hopefully, the Franciscan College will now start paying taxes.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: health, obama, insurance, college, student, plan, catholic, control, birth, mandate
  • 10
    May
    2012
    5:22pm, EDT

    Strong online support for Obama's same-sex marriage stance; election impact disputed

    Crimson Hexagon Inc.

    While general online sentiment strongly favored President Barack Obama's statement, judgments of its political impact were much more closely divided.

    By M. Alex Johnson, msnbc.com

    Online reaction to President Barack Obama's endorsement of same-sex marriage is running 3-to-1 in his favor, but commenters are sharply divided over whether it will help him or hurt him in November, according to a computer-assisted analysis of hundreds of thousands of social media posts in the first 24 hours after the announcement.


    M. Alex Johnson

    M. Alex Johnson is a reporter for msnbc.com. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.


    The analysis examined 532,000 posts on Twitter and Facebook, about 300,000 of which expressed a clear opinion about Obama's statement. Of those, 72 percent approved of the announcement.


    (The analysis — which ran from 3 p.m. ET Wednesday, when ABC News broadcast its interview with Obama, through 3 p.m. ET Thursday — used a tool called ForSight, a natural-language data platform developed by Crimson Hexagon Inc. For this type of sentiment analysis, Crimson Hexagon reports a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points among the self-selected social media audience. Click here for a detailed explanation.)

    While Obama won widespread praise online, a significant proportion of it was grudging.

    Many supporters of same-sex marriage criticized the president for not having announced his position until now, 3½ years into his presidency. Fully a third of those agreeing with the decision did so while asking, in essence, "What took you so long?" 

    Twitter.com

    Twitter.com

    A further 18 percent of those agreeing with the announcement complained that the president hadn't gone far enough, with some noting that he stopped short of taking any concrete action, such as proposing legislation or issuing an executive order to have federal agencies recognize same-sex marriages.

    Twitter.com

    Twitter.com

    By contrast, opponents of Obama's announcement strongly indicated that they believed it was a politically cynical move.
    Nearly half of those opposing the move — 47 percent — expressed sentiments like these:

    Facebook.com

    Twitter.com

    Interestingly, about a fifth of the sample — well more than 100,000 people — chose to analyze the announcement not so much on its merits but on whom it would benefit in the general election. And by 52 percent to 48 percent, a slim majority of those thought it would likely help Obama and other Democrats.

    Twitter.com

    Twitter.com

    The social media analysis is also notable for its variance from public opinion at large. Recent polls generally indicate that only about half of Americans believe same-sex marriages should be legal; the most recent Gallup Poll, taken May 3-6, for example, showed a 50 percent to 48 percent split.

    Following Obama's support of gay marriage, a flood of emotions

    A possible explanation lies in the makeup of the social media audience. 

    The Pew Internet & American Life Project, which uses ForSight in its statistical analysis of social media, reported in March that people who identify themselves as liberal are more likely to use social networking sites than are people who identify as conservatives.

    Watch US News videos on msnbc.com

    Moreover, marketing surveys indicate that people who identify themselves as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered are more frequent users of social media than the population as a whole.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Obama who? Gay marriage foes seek to extend gains
    • US priests reportedly behind crackdown on nuns
    • Video: Rep. Frank 'pleased' with Obama on gay marriage
    • Cyclist spots stolen bike on Craigslist, steals it back
    • Feds sue Sheriff Joe, alleging racial profiling

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    379 comments

    I just don't see why it is such an issue, why should straight people be the only ones to suffer thru marriage.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, obama, social-media, featured, same-sex-marriage, m-alex-johnson, crimson-hexagon
  • 9
    May
    2012
    6:36pm, EDT

    Obama's support for gay marriage sparks Web reaction

    139 comments

    If the GOP is so focused on the economy, then who is proposing these amendments?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: obama, barack-obama, gay-marriage, storify
  • 9
    May
    2012
    2:22pm, EDT

    Obama aide says she knew John Edwards was lying about affair

    During another emotional day at the John Edwards trial, Edwards' former press secretary recounted how Elizabeth Edwards angrily confronted a donor who was helping Rielle Hunter. NBC's Lisa Myers reports.

    Updated at 6:40 p.m. ET: President Barack Obama's deputy communications director testified Wednesday that she knew former Sen. John Edwards was lying about his affair when she served as his presidential campaign spokeswoman.


    Lisa Myers, Michael Austin and Stacey Klein of NBC News and Ben Thompson of NBC station WCNC of Charlotte, N.C., contributed to this report by M. Alex Johnson of msnbc.com. Follow M. Alex Johnson on Twitter and Facebook.


    The aide, Jennifer Palmieri, told jurors that she intentionally scheduled Edwards' interview with ABC News in August 2008 during the opening ceremonies of the Summer Olympic Games to limit the potential audience for what she feared would be Edwards' intentional misstatements.

    Palmieri's testimony — a rare appearance by a sitting White House official in a criminal trial — came on the 13th day of Edwards' trial in U.S. District Court in Greensboro, N.C., where he is charged with six felony counts of accepting about $1 million in illegal and unreported campaign donations from two wealthy supporters.


    • Full trial coverage on msnbc.com
    • Analysis by Hampton Dellinger

    Palmieri related a heated exchange in an Iowa hotel room in 2007 during which Edwards' wife, Elizabeth, confronted the campaign's finance chairman, the late Fred Baron, over his payments to Edwards' mistress, Rielle Hunter. Baron and billionaire heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon, spent about $1 million to help Edwards cover up his affair.

    Palmieri said "Elizabeth was very upset" when she learned that Baron and his wife, Lisa Blue, were in contact with Hunter. Blue had even taken Hunter to Los Angeles on a shopping trip. 

    Slideshow: Edwards' public life

    Former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards has faced public and private challenges throughout his life and career.

    Launch slideshow

    Elizabeth Edwards was worried that spending time and money on Hunter "makes John look even more guilty." 

    "Lisa was saying 'you gotta hold your friends close and your enemies even closer,'" Palmieri said, and that "Rielle was a loose cannon" who might go to the press.

    "It was a very emotional scene," she said. 

    Palmieri broke down in tears on the stand recounting the death in December 2010 of Elizabeth Edwards, her close friend. She recalled that when the Edwardses split, Elizabeth Edwards was worried that when she died, there would be no man there to love her.

    John Edwards was at his wife's side when she died and was in court to hear Palmieri's emotional story. But his daughter, Cate, had left the courthouse.

    Prosecutors were nearing the end of their witness list and could wrap up their case as early as Thursday. so far, they have given no indication that they intend to call Hunter to testify.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Piglets twirled, pigs kicked by farm workers, activist video shows
    • Conservative author drops claim of two Pulitzer nominations
    • Viewing child porn 'legal' in New York, court finds
    • Principal: Errors get Nevada high school ranked 13th in US
    • Video: More girls suffering sports-related concussions
    • Half of Americans support gay marriage in new poll

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    26 comments

    Oh that's right, when democrats do slimy stuff, we should all just look the other way, ignore it. Do you realize how little media coverage this is getting in relation to the scope of the importance of it, meaning this guy was incredibly close to being the VP of the USA?? Do you see the word "Democr …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, crime, john-edwards, obama, featured, rielle-hunter, john-edwards-trial, jennifer-palmieri
  • 8
    May
    2012
    3:43pm, EDT

    President Obama 'stingy' on pardons, says clemency expert

    By Kari Huus, msnbc.com

    Pool / Getty Images

    President Barack Obama greets guests during a Cinco de Mayo reception in the Rose Garden at the White House on Thursday.

    President Barack Obama is on track to be one of the least forgiving of presidents in U.S. history — as measured by his use of presidential pardon powers, according to a political science professor who blogs about clemency exercised by presidents and governors.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    Kari Huus


    Follow Kari Huus on Twitter and Facebook.



    "It is fair to say two things," said P.S. Ruckman Jr., who teaches at Rock Valley College in Rockville, Ill. "One is (Obama) is definitely being exceptionally stingy. There’s no doubt about that. There’s also no doubt that this is in a way unexpected."

    As president, Obama has pardoned 23 people, including one commuted sentence, in his first 40 months in office. Barring a dramatic flurry of clemency from the White House in the coming eight months, Obama will be among the bottom two or three presidents for granting pardons in his first term, Ruckman said. That puts him in the running with Presidents George Washington, John Adams and James Garfield, who was assassinated after serving less than seven months.


    While campaigning for office, Obama was critical of the mandatory minimum penalties for drugs, especially those that specified much heavier sentences for those using crack cocaine than to the ones associated with more expensive powder cocaine.

    Mandatory minimums, which emerged in the 1980s, are partially responsible for swelling federal prison populations — to 218,261 on the week of May 3, compared to 24,363 in 1980, according to government documents. 

    In April 2010, the president signed into law the Fair Sentencing Act, which aimed to even out the mandatory minimums, which critics say are discriminatory to African Americans.

    But Obama did not — as some expected or hoped — go on to throw open the doors for large numbers of people incarcerated under the old mandatory sentences.

    Instead, most of the president’s acts of clemency — about half of them for drug-related offenses — have followed a pattern that has changed little since President Eisenhower.

    "The great majority of activity that goes on today is pardons — typically for old, minor offenses, and minor sentences. All it does is restore (the convicted person) their rights — so they can vote, carry a gun to go hunting,” Ruckman said. "Arguably they are most often given to the people who need them the least."

    Single commutation for drug sentence
    In fact, most people who are pardoned have not served any jail time. In Obama’s case, that was true of 12 of the 23 people he pardoned. All but one of the others had long since been released.

    See Ruckman's chart of pardons by president
    See Ruckman's chart of pardons by presidential term

    That one exception came on Nov. 21 — the president’s most recent use of his pardon powers — when he commuted the sentence of Eugenia Marie Jennings, 34, who had served about half of her 22-year prison term for a cocaine distribution offense. She got out in December, with eight years of supervised release.

    In a statement then from the nonprofit Families Against Mandatory Minimums, president Julie Stewart urged Obama "to continue exercising his clemency power and grant more commutations to the many deserving federal prisoners, like Eugenia, who have paid a hefty price for their mistakes and deserve a second chance."

    Obama could step it up in the last quarter. Historically, presidents do tend to grant more pardons in the fourth quarter of each year, especially the fourth quarter of the final year in the term, Ruckman said.

    Among recent presidents, George W. Bush had granted 37 pardons and commutations at about this point in his first term. By the end of the year, he had added another 32.

    Watch the Top Videos on msnbc.com

    The odds of being granted clemency have become much tougher over the years, with applications climbing into the thousands per year, and presidents awarding fewer of them, as illustrated in this graphic from the Department of Justice.

    Second-term flurry?
    Obama may also be reserving acts of clemency for his second term, if he gets one. 

    Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both granted many more pardons in their second terms than they did in their first. Clinton famously — and controversially — pardoned 120 people in his final hours in office, including his half-brother Roger Clinton who had already completed a sentence for drug charges, and Marc Rich, a fugitive millionaire who was living in Switzerland and was wanted in the United States on tax evasion charges.

    But none of these recent presidents comes close to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the use of pardon power. He granted about 600 pardons and commutations by the end of his first term, and about 2,800 over the course of his historic 12 years in office (1933-1945) before the two-term limit went into effect. 

    But even among modern presidents, Obama's current pace keeps him firmly among the most conservative American presidents to use these powers of forgiveness.

    The average age of individuals pardoned by Obama is about 61, according to Ruckman and the average time between the original sentence and executive clemency granted by this president is 24.3 years. 

    Follow Kari Huus on Facebook

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Cops shoot mom, knife-wielding son in New York City
    • Video: Mom recalls rescue from car dangling off bridge
    • Addicted to your cellphone? Nomophobia on the rise
    • Juror's 'experiment' threatens Polo Club founder's conviction
    • Guess the most porn-crazy city in America

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    258 comments

    Obama has done something right. Keep the criminals where they belong.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: obama, crime, drugs, pardons, kari-huus, clemency
  • 7
    May
    2012
    7:08am, EDT

    Prostitute at center of Secret Service scandal: Agents were 'stupid brutes'

    The prostitute at the center of the Secret Service sex scandal speaks in her first American television interview, calling the agents "stupid brutes" and saying she's "not to blame for being attractive." NBC's Michelle Kosinski reports.

    By Michelle Kosinski and Denny Alfonso, NBC News

    Updated at 8:16 a.m. ET: MADRID, Spain -- A woman identifying herself as the Colombian prostitute at the center of a scandal involving U.S. Secret Service personnel has called the group of agents "stupid brutes" who put partying above President Barack Obama's security. 

    "These seem like completely stupid, idiotic people," Dania Londono Suarez said in an interview which aired on Monday's TODAY. "I don't know how Obama had them in his security force."

    She also accused the agents of "leaving their duty behind" and described them as "stupid brutes."


    The scandal broke in April when, in advance of Obama's arrival at the Summit of the Americas in Cartagena, Colombia, agents allegedly brought prostitutes to their hotel rooms.  One of the men, Suarez told NBC News, refused to pay her for sex so she went to the police.

    So far, eight agents have lost their jobs as a result of the incident.

    Suarez, 24, said three men who approached and propositioned her and her friends were drinking vodka like it was water.

    "They liked to show off their bodies, great bodies, well-defined abs," Saurez said of the men she first met at a nightclub. "They liked attention." 

    NBC's Kristen Welker talks about the interview given by the woman in the middle of scandal, in which she alleges she did not know the men were Secret Service agents.

    The mother of a nine-year-old son said she made it perfectly clear to one that a night with her would cost $800.

    "And he accepted. And it was clear," she said. 

    But in the morning after they had had sex, the man gave her only $50 and ordered her out of the room, Suarez said. 

    "I am not to blame for being attractive," she told TODAY. "They are to blame -- for leaving their duty behind."

    Related stories:

    Prostitute at center of Secret Service scandal: 'I would have been able to get everything'

    Watch the most-viewed videos on msnbc.com 

    Colombia hookers not tied to cartels, terrorists, source tells NBC

    Some Secret Service agents agree to lie detector tests in prostitution scandal

    NBC: Prostitute's $50 fee for two agents triggered Secret Service scandal

    Members of elite unit among those suspended in Colombia

    More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Secret Service agents were 'brutes,' prostitute says
    • Meet Monsieur Caramel Pudding, France's next president
    • Al-Qaida releases video of American hostage
    • Report: Fake bomb exposes London Olympic security
    • Woman, child survive mauling by cheetahs 

    Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

     

    1390 comments

    $800 versus $50... close enough. These fools have been around politicians too long. It shows both in their actions and in keeping their promises. An all night drunk is like the campaign before being elected... you wake up and only want to pay $50.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: obama, featured, scandal, colombia, secret-service, prostitute, dania
  • 1
    May
    2012
    5:05pm, EDT

    Advance report of Obama's Afghanistan trip raises new security concerns

    President Barack Obama arrived in Kabul to sign a 10-year security agreement with Afghanistan. NBC's Chuck Todd and Jim Miklaszewski report.

    By M. Alex Johnson, msnbc.com

    When President Barack Obama arrived Tuesday in Afghanistan on the first anniversary of the killing of Osama Bin Laden, it was supposed to be a secret, like his earlier visits to the dangerous region. But news of the trip leaked out hours earlier, raising new alarm bells about the president's security.

    The Afghan news station TOLONews reported early Tuesday that Obama had arrived in Kabul, hours before the White House's embargo on reporting the news was lifted. Other news organizations, including The New York Post and the official Chinese news agency, Xinhua, cited that report, which was attributed to unnamed Afghan officials.

    The U.S. National Security Council and the U.S. Embassy in Kabul both denied the report, and Obama's official schedule indicated that he was still in Washington, meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in the Oval Office:


    President Barack Obama's official schedule for Tuesday indicated that the president was remaining in Washington all day.

    In fact, he had left Joint Base Andrews, Md., aboard Air Force One shortly after midnight Tuesday morning.


    M. Alex Johnson

    M. Alex Johnson is a reporter for msnbc.com. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.


    In the face of the official denials, the Post removed its report, as did Buzzfeed, which deleted a tweet noting the news after an NSC official called it to argue that its report endangered Obama's life, it said.

    Obama's previous visits to Afghanistan, in March and December 2010, were unannounced for security reasons, and news of them didn't leak out. And strict security measures were in place Tuesday as well, including a White House embargo that prevented journalists traveling with the president from reporting the trip until Obama arrived at the Afghan Presidential Palace about 11:30 p.m. (2:30 p.m. ET), hours after the TOLONews report was published.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    But this time the news did get out, and at an uncomfortable time for U.S. security officials.

    The apparent breach comes in the wake of an incident last month in which members of the president's advance security team were reported to have picked up prostitutes in Cartagena, Colombia, before Obama's visit to the Summit of the Americas. Eight Secret Service agents have been forced to leave the agency as a result of the scandal.

    The Defense Department said it couldn't discuss the incident, and the White House didn't immediately return calls for comment. Editors at TOLONews did not respond to an email seeking comment.

    Ronald Kessler, a longtime political reporter who interviewed more than 100 active and former Secret Service agents for "In the President's Secret Service," a book on presidential security arrangements, told msnbc.com that an early report on a surprise visit "clearly endangers the president when he's going into a war zone."

    The biggest concern, he said, "is the possibility of attacks on the ground when (Obama) lands and thereafter."

    NBC News and other news organizations learned about the trip Tuesday but withheld reporting it until Obama arrived at the palace. But "the fact so many U.S. reporters knew about it made it easier for it to disseminate," Kessler said.

    Kessler suggested that the Obama administration follow the example of the administration of former President George W. Bush, "which did not let reporters know beforehand at all" when Bush traveled to Afghanistan.

    "They told the press pool that they were going to go on a trip, (but) they weren't told where," Kessler said. "It was not until they got on the airplane that they were told they were going to Afghanistan."

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Occupy activists fear becoming Democrats' 'pet'
    • Video: Woman, 81, uses hand sanitizer to fend off pit bull
    • Bin Laden's lair: Hatching plots with no one to execute them
    • Mom, son killed in separate car accidents hours apart
    • Anarchists nabbed in alleged plot to bomb Ohio bridge
    • EPA official resigns over 'crucify' philosophy

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    172 comments

    There is loyal opposition to the President and then there is the opposition of some on the extreme right. Many self professed Tea Partiers and others, are little more than confederates who wish the President harm. Not since Abraham Lincoln have we seen such a situation where a duly elected President …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: security, obama, afghanistan, featured, media, m-alex-johnson, ronald-kessler
  • 1
    May
    2012
    9:13am, EDT

    'Battle for the soul of Occupy': Activists fear being 'pulled to the right,' becoming Democratic 'pet'

    Occupy Wall Street protesters are planning coast-to-coast demonstrations Tuesday in honor of "May Day" or International Workers' Day. The protesters are calling for a general strike and are encouraging workers to stay home. The Morning Joe panel discusses.

    By Miranda Leitsinger, msnbc.com

    As Occupy protesters hit the streets for a nationwide general strike on Tuesday, some in the movement fear the emergence of two new activist outfits made up of "old left" advocacy groups and unions is an attempt to turn them into a "pet" for the Democratic Party and President Obama’s reelection effort.

    Follow @mimileitsinger

    The new groups, 99% Power and 99% Spring, include backers such as MoveOn.org, Rebuild The Dream, AFL-CIO, United Auto Workers, CODEPINK: Women for Peace, and The Ruckus Society. The groups bring money with them – something in short supply for Occupy – but their efforts are being eyed warily by those who helped launch the Occupy movement.

    Adbusters, the Canadian magazine that made the initial call for people to Occupy Wall Street on Sept. 17 of last year, has been running a blog series on their website, "Battle for the Soul of Occupy," in the last few weeks. In it, the publication has decried attempts to "neutralize our insurgency with an insidious campaign of donor money and co-optation."

    "This counter-strategy worked to kill off the Tea Party’s outrage and turn it into a puppet of the Republican Party. Will the same happen with Occupy Wall Street? Will our insurgency turn into the Democrats’ Tea Party pet?" Adbusters wrote in an April 12 post. "Will you allow Occupy to become a project of the old left, the same cabal of old world thinkers who have blunted the possibility of revolution for decades? Will you allow MoveOn, The Nation and Ben & Jerry to put the brakes on our Spring Offensive and turn our struggle into a ‘99% Spring’ reelection campaign for President Obama?"

    Skepticism of electoral politics runs deep in the Occupy movement and it could affect the ability of Democrats to mobilize activists during the 2012 campaign, despite attempts to appropriate the "99 percent" rhetoric. But Todd Gitlin, a former leader of the 1960s group, Students for a Democratic Society, who has just published a book on Occupy, believes the concerns of some in the movement are "outlandish."

    Protesters hit the streets for May Day rallies

    "It was inevitable that there would arise political actors that want those same reforms, although they don’t necessarily share the real-time spirit of the movement. These are the membership organizations, like the unions and MoveOn … who did turn out for the big marches in October and November, and who are numerically very large but were always from the beginning being met with suspicion on the part of the Occupy movement," said Gitlin, a professor of sociology and journalism at Columbia University.

    "This represents actually a misunderstanding on the part of some of the Occupy people who feel weak, so they’re afraid of co-optation because they feel that the co-opters have the power to puncture their balloon," he added.

    Still, the new groups don’t sit well with Charles M. Young, a writer at thiscantbehappening.net and a 1960s-era activist. He attended one of the mid-April training sessions held by The 99% Spring on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, which he said was led by representatives of the Democratic Party and Wall Street lawyers, and where Obama buttons were offered for sale.

    Up host Chris Hayes leads the conversation on civil disobedience in light of the Occupy Wall Street movement, and the groups that are emerging to teach protesters non-violent demonstration tactics.

    Young, 61, feared that Occupy could be "pulled to the right" by partnering up with them and felt the effort was part of a bid to keep the "Kucinich Democrats" from leaving.

    "It looks very much like what they call an AstroTurf movement, you know, something from the top down," he said, noting he left the meeting "disillusioned." "I don’t remember anybody saying that there was a need for the 99% Spring before it came out."

    "It does seem to be mostly the Democratic Party trying to keep the left in line for Obama and keeping things obedient, and that’s just not enough given the issues involved," he added.

    In an email statement, Justin Ruben, MoveOn's executive director, said his group has electoral goals, but that his organization has "zero interest in trying to alter [Occupy] in any way."

    "Growing economic inequality and the increasing influence of 1 percent cash in our political system are huge problems, and problems that MoveOn members care deeply about. Our response includes working to engage more activists in the fight for fairness for the 99 percent and to introduce activists to powerful tactics like non-violent direct action. That's what the 99% Spring is about," he said.

    "Regarding elections, yes, there's no question that MoveOn sees elections as profoundly important, and we will be engaged in elections this year -- just as we've engaged in elections since our inception in 1998. But of course we work with lots of allies that don't engage in elections, and we respect that choice," he added.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    Dorian Warren, an assistant professor of political science at Columbia University, said schisms on the left today are similar to those during the civil rights movements. There were "intense fights between the old guard" groups like the NAACP and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and the youth-led Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, he said. In hindsight, the youth-led group played an important role, serving as "the left flank of the movement," he said. "That’s sort of the role Occupy is playing."

    But Occupy should be skeptical and challenge the progressive establishment, he said. "Until September, the strategies of these groups, whether it was ‘inside the Beltway’ game or just traditional interest group politics, that was not working, and so the more radical tactics that Occupy innovated is what shifted the political terrain and they should stay focused on doing that."

    The 99% Spring and 99% Power have given a nod to Occupy for leading the way, though they also said they had been drafting plans to engage in more public protest and focus on corporate accountability before Occupy existed. They had targeted the fall for their campaign, but then Occupy took off, which in turn helped them convince others of the viability of their own strategy, said George Goehl, executive director of National People’s Action.

    Occupy reinvented: '99 percent' protesters target General Electric

    "It opened up some space for some of the things that we’ve been working on for a long time, and it was really just kind of liberating … in terms of what was possible and also in terms of kind of confirming what we thought," he said.

    Goehl said members of Occupy have joined his group’s trainings – or led them – and some consider themselves as part of 99% Power. He said when he was in Des Moines last week at a protest, three of the 12 people arrested were from Occupy.

    "I think what we’re seeing is … a growing number of threads that do speak to the need to be fearless truth tellers around what’s truly going on in this country to both engage in nonviolent direct action and to challenge the dominance of the corporate sector both, you know, in our economy and in our politics," he said. "And I think that, you know, Occupy is a thread of that, 99% Spring is a thread of that, 99% Power … it’s all part of the same thing."

    He said that the notion that any electoral objectives were part of their strategy was "completely false."

    "The organizations that actually started this idea don’t really run big electoral programs. It’s not been that kind of the focus in terms of strategies and tactics," he added.

    In the end, Warren, the politics professor, said he thought there could be "too much focus on who’s co-opting Occupy versus Occupy just doing its work."

    Success during big events like Tuesday’s May Day actions will actually depend on how many people that the unions, MoveOn and other groups turn out, Warren said. "In that sense, Occupy’s fate is linked to these other groups and these others groups’ fates are linked to Occupy."

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Teens hit by car -- while tanning on rural road
    • Hiker beats hypothermia after 3 days lost in desert
    • EPA official resigns over 'crucify' philosophy
    • No signs of distress before yacht race tragedy

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    864 comments

    Don't worry Occupy, nobody wants a dysfunctional "pet".

    Show more
    Explore related topics: obama, democrats, occupy, moveon
  • 30
    Apr
    2012
    6:05pm, EDT

    U.S. official acknowledges drone strikes, says civilian deaths 'exceedingly rare'

    Counterterrorism advisor Jon Brennan outlined the use of drones, arguing that it's legal and has reduced the ability of al-Qaida to attack the U.S. NBC News senior investigative producer Bob Windrem and The National Journal's Yochi Dreazen discuss.

    By Michael Isikoff, NBC News

    White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan on Monday spoke openly -- and at great length -- about what has long been one of the government’s most controversial official secrets:  the use of remotely piloted drones to kill suspected terrorists.

    In doing so, he became the first U.S. government official to acknowledge that the drone strikes sometimes kill innocent people, though he characterized such deaths as  “exceedingly rare.” But a new analysis by an independent Washington think tank estimates that more than 300 civilians have been killed by drones since President Barack Obama took office.

    In a major speech on the anniversary of Osama bin Laden’s death during a raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan, by U.S. Navy SEALs, Brennan proclaimed that al-Qaida is now "on the path to its destruction."  But the headline was what he had to say about the drone program — long a forbidden subject for senior U.S. officials  — and how the U.S. government uses it.


    “The United States conducts targeted strikes against specific al-Qaida terrorists, sometimes using remotely piloted aircraft, often referred to publicly as drones,” said Brennan, in his speech at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, a Washington, D.C., foreign policy think tank.  

    While it has been openly reported in the press for years, the use by the CIA of pilotless drones to kill members of al-Qaida has long been officially classified,  prompting government officials to talk obliquely about “lethal operations” and “removal” of terrorists. They have done so even as Obama has dramatically escalated the number of such attacks and made them the central component of the administration’s counterterrorism efforts.

    Saul Loeb / Getty Images

    White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan in a May 2, 2011, file photo.

    One U.S. intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told NBC News that the speech represents “a pretty big sea change for us” in terms of what officials will now be permitted to talk about. But the official said that while Brennan’s speech had been carefully vetted throughout the U.S. intelligence and national security community, there had been no formal declassification of the drone program. “The president can declassify anything he wants,” said the official, adding that Brennan – as the representative of the president — can speak about anything his boss wants him to discuss.   

    Under Obama, there have been an estimated 250 drone strikes in northwest Pakistan that have killed as many as 2,345 people, according to an analysis by the New America Foundation, a Washington think tank that closely tracks the program. Such strikes have generated a storm of protest in Pakistan and stepped up demands by the Pakistani government to halt them.   

    In what he described as an effort to be more open with the American people, Brennan on Monday described an elaborate process under which senior government officials select targets for drone strikes. They must first determine whether a prospective target is a bona fide member of al-Qaida or “associated forces” and poses a “significant threat” to U.S. interests.  The “lethal action” strikes are not used for “punishing terrorists for past crimes” or “seeking vengeance.” Instead, they are used to “stop plots” and “prevent future attacks,” citing as one example, targeting individuals  who possess “unique operational skills.”

    Read more reporting by Michael Isikoff in 'The Isikoff Files'

    Brennan  said the use of drones gives U.S. intelligence agencies the ability to use “laser-like” precision against the terrorists. But he acknowledged that "innocent civilians have been killed in these strikes." He said such instances have been "exceedingly rare, but it has happened.

    “When it does, it pains us and we regret it deeply, as we do any time innocents are killed in war," he added. 

    That passage of his speech alone was significant. In June 2011, Brennan said that in the previous year of operations in the government’s then-unspecified program to eliminate al-Qaida members, “There hasn’t been a single collateral death because of the exceptional proficiency, precision of the capabilities we’ve been able to develop.”   

    Brennan later changed that statement in response to questions by the New York Times, spurred in part by  reports about a May 6 strike in Pakistan that  hit a religious school, an adjourning restaurant and a house, killing 18 people. Although 12 militants were allegedly killed, British and Pakistani journalists on the scene reported that six civilians also died in the strike.

    In Brennan’s adjusted statement last year, he said, “Fortunately, for more than a year, due to our discretion and precision, the U.S. government has not found credible evidence of collateral deaths resulting from U.S. counterterrorism operations outside of Afghanistan or Iraq.”

    Brennan did not give any details on Monday about how rare civilian deaths have been. But according to the analysis by the New America Foundation, which relies heavily on local media and other reports from observers in Pakistan, about 17 percent of those who have been killed by drones since the program effectively began in 2004 were “non-militants.”  The foundation estimated that the  “non-military fatality rate” has since dropped to about 13 percent under Obama – as drone strikes have become more frequent and more precise.

    Those numbers translate to 471 civilian deaths, including 309 under Obama.

    Human rights groups — who have challenged the administration to be more open about its drone program — were not satisfied with the new details provided by Brennan’s speech.

    “It is not enough that care is taken to avoid harm to innocent civilians,” said Raha Wala, an official with Human Rights First. “Brennan's assertion that any 'member' of al-Qaida or 'associated forces' is legally targetable is wrong. Under the laws of armed conflict, only members of the enemy's armed forces, or those directly participating in hostilities or who perform a continuous combat function, may be targeted.”

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Video: Lucky fan survives 60-foot fall   | More top videos
    • Occupy activists fear becoming Democrats' 'pet'
    • Teens hit by car -- while tanning on rural road
    • Hiker beats hypothermia after 3 days lost in desert
    • EPA official resigns over 'crucify' philosophy

    430 comments

    Well blah, blah, blah. When you are fighting a war innocent people are going to die. When are the President and his people going to understand that what is secret must be kept secret (such as not announcing that it was Navy Seals who went in and got Osama). There was no reason for them to say we hav …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: obama, featured, pakistan, drones, counterterrorism, john-brennan
  • 27
    Apr
    2012
    11:55am, EDT

    Trademarking 'GI Bill': Obama targets diploma mills that market to vets

    AFP - Getty Images

    President Barack Obama, alongside Michelle Obama signs an order to protect U.S. service members from deceptive targeting by educational institutions, after speaking to troops at Third Infantry Division Headquarters at Fort Stewart in Hinesville, Ga.

    By Annie Gearan , The Associated Press

    WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration wants to trademark the term "GI Bill" in an effort to shield veterans and military families being swindled or misled by schools that target their federal education benefits.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    President Barack Obama signed a wide-ranging order on Friday that partially addresses growing complaints about fraudulent marketing and recruiting practices aimed at military families eligible for federal education loans under the GI Bill.

    The president and first lady Michelle Obama addressed troops at the Fort Stewart Army post in Georgia, where Obama signed the executive order mandating several new education protections for military service members.


    There is little the federal government can do to shut down diploma mills, but the new protections would make it harder for post-secondary and technical schools to misrepresent themselves to military students.

    The main target of the White House action is for-profit colleges and universities that market heavily to military families because of the easy availability of federal loan money under the GI Bill.

    Some post-secondary schools target current and former military service members using deceptive military-themed websites that appear to be government-run or connected to the GI Bill benefit system, administration officials said.

    'Know Before You Owe'
    The financial regulation overhaul that Obama signed in 2010 included the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with specific authority to protect members of the military from predatory financial practices.

    The law set up an Office of Service Member Affairs to help members of the military and their families "make better informed decisions regarding consumer financial products and services."

    Bills pending in Congress, largely backed by Democrats and unlikely to become law soon, would do many of the same things Obama was ordering Friday.

    Watch the Top Videos on msnbc.com

    Obama's order will also set a new gauge that potential students can use to calculate how much a school will really cost in tuition and fees. Schools are asked to voluntarily participate in the "Know Before You Owe" system this school year and would be required to do so next year.

    Federal money, most of it through the financial aid students receive, accounts for up to 90 percent of for-profit colleges' revenue — even more if veterans attend the school on the GI Bill.

    Some schools spend a quarter or more of their revenue on recruiting, far more than traditional colleges. In some cases, recruiting expenses approach what these institutions spend on instruction.

    A recent Senate report on 15 large, publicly traded for-profit education companies said they got 86 percent of their revenue from taxpayers and have spent a combined $3.7 billion annually on marketing and recruiting.

    Military veterans are particularly attractive recruiting targets because they come with generous federal tuition support and also don't count toward a limit called the "90/10" rule, which requires colleges to get at least 10 percent of their revenue from nonfederal sources.

    Student Veterans of America, a leading campus veterans group, applauded the White House announcement, saying the executive order would help stop "deceptive and misleading" practices at educational institutions.

    The Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities, which represents for-profits, said in a statement it was disappointed that Obama "decided to bypass the Congress" with an executive order.

    "Career-oriented institutions proudly serve military and veteran populations, and work with congressional leaders in a bipartisan manner to address concerns about veteran education across all sectors of higher education," the lobbying group said.

    Quality at for-profit colleges varies widely, and many are a good fit for students, particularly adult learners looking for flexible scheduling and specialized career training that often requires a certificate but not a degree.

    Watch US News videos on msnbc.com

    But while comparing graduation rates can be misleading for those reasons, for-profit schools on average have lower success rates than traditional colleges on a variety of measures. The Senate report found that almost 2 million students withdrew from large for-profit colleges over a three-year period. Among those who enrolled at 10 large chains in 2008-2009, 54 percent had quit by the summer of 2010.

    Default rate
    Meanwhile, the latest figures from the Education Department put the default rate on federal student loans for students at for-profit colleges at 15 percent, compared with 7.2 percent at public nonprofit universities and 4.6 percent at private nonprofit colleges.

    The industry points out that's partly because its schools tend to serve lower-income students. But difficulties transferring credits and having credentials from for-profit colleges rewarded in the job market also play a role.

    The Obamas were to be joined in Georgia by Holly Petraeus, the assistant director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau focused on economic security for military families. She's the wife of David Petraeus, the four-star general and current CIA director.

    Unlike many recent trips in which Obama has visited states that are central to his re-election, his visit to Georgia — a solidly Republican state — has no obvious political benefit.

    The president has, however, focused on initiatives aimed at attracting young voters, and many of the military service members who would benefit from Friday's action fall into that category.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Lawyer: Autistic boy's teacher didn't call him 'bastard'
    • World record holder for 'longest time to live with a bullet in the head' dies
    • Guess who's coming to dinner? Navy family starts unique deployment ritual
    • Attorney: Zimmerman's website raised more than $200,000
    • Which dress will get you barred from this prom?

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    7 comments

    If government really wanted to put away the for profit universities they would lower the amount of money they offer for student loans. And I mean lower it dramatically. I recently graduated from a for profit school with an AA. Every time the government increased the maximum amount they would loan to …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: obama, military, financial, bill, aid, vets, gi
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • crime,
  • gulf-oil-spill,
  • environment,
  • weather,
  • us-news,
  • florida,
  • military,
  • california,
  • shooting,
  • trayvon-martin,
  • obama,
  • education,
  • politics,
  • texas,
  • occupy,
  • bp,
  • george-zimmerman,
  • kari-huus,
  • new-york,
  • police,
  • chicago,
  • afghanistan,
  • school,
  • los-angeles,
  • business,
  • arizona,
  • murder,
  • economy,
  • barack-obama,
  • winter,
  • gay,
  • hurricane,
  • immigration,
  • new-jersey
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Bill Dedman

Investigative reporter Bill Dedman of msnbc.com is always looking for good investigative story ideas and documents. Bill received the 1989 Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting, and has written full time for msnbc.com since 2006.

Bill Dedman Blogroll

  • Bill's investigative reporting feed on Twitter
  • ABC News The Blotter
  • Center for Investigative Reporting
  • Center for Public Integrity
  • Center for Public Integrity's Paper Trail blog
  • Huffington Post Investigative Fund
  • Investigative Reporters and Editors' Extra! Extra!
  • McClatchey blog Nukes & Spooks
  • New York Times' City Room Records blog
  • New York Times' Open data blog
  • ProPublica
  • ProPublica blog
  • Yahoo! News The Upshot
  • TPM Muckraker
  • Washington Post Investigations
  • WhoWhatWhy forensic journalism
  • New England Center for Investigative Center at Bos
  • Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism
  • Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting
  • Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism, B
  • MinnPost.com
  • The Washington Independent
  • AU Investivative Reporting Workshop
  • Become a fan on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
Have an idea?
Send your ideas and documents for investigative stories.

Miranda Leitsinger

Archives

  • 2012
    • May (404)
    • April (538)
    • March (576)
    • February (471)
    • January (417)
  • 2011
    • December (455)
    • November (190)
    • October (9)
    • September (3)
    • August (51)
    • July (8)
    • June (3)
    • May (12)
    • April (5)
    • March (3)
    • February (1)
    • January (8)
  • 2010
    • December (5)
    • November (1)
    • October (2)
    • September (28)
    • August (40)
    • July (35)
    • June (177)
    • May (50)
    • April (9)
    • March (2)
    • February (2)
    • January (4)
  • 2009
    • December (5)
    • November (5)
    • October (2)
    • September (11)
    • August (4)
    • July (12)
    • June (1)
    • May (1)
    • April (1)
    • March (3)
    • February (3)
    • January (2)
  • 2008
    • December (3)
    • November (2)
    • October (6)
    • September (30)
    • August (26)
    • July (10)
    • June (4)
    • May (8)
    • April (13)
    • March (9)
    • February (7)
    • January (6)
  • 2007
    • December (10)
    • November (6)
    • October (22)
    • September (11)

Most Commented

  • US veterans to return war medals in protest (1812)
  • Court docs: Trayvon Martin shooting 'ultimately avoidable by Zimmerman' (4275)
  • Physician: Zimmerman had broken nose, black eye (3229)
  • Key witness in Trayvon Martin shooting changed story (4100)
  • Protest erupts after all-white jury acquits ex-Houston cop over teen's beating (1613)
  • Former Rutgers student Dharun Ravi sentenced to 30-day jail term in webcam spying case (1602)
  • Trayvon Martin killed by single gunshot fired from 'intermediate range,' autopsy shows (2264)
  • Nurses (yes, nurses) lead charge for Wall Street 'sin' tax (1058)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • Gadgetbox
  • Technolog
  • Daryl Cagle's Cartoon Blog
  • Open Channel
  • InGame

msnbc.com top stories

3147,10
© 2012 msnbc.com
  • US news on msnbc.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Terms & Conditions
  • MSN Privacy
  • Legal
  • Advertise
Advertise | AdChoices