Officials: Horse's metal shoes sparked fatal blast in oxygen chamber

Jenifer Lowe / AP

This photo provided by the Marion County Sheriff's Office, a Marion County Crime Scene investigator photographs the damages caused by an explosion at an equine rehabilitation center in north Florida's horse country that killed a worker and a horse in Ocala, Friday, Feb. 10, 2012.

An explosion that killed a 28-year-old woman operating a hyperbaric chamber at a Florida equine therapy center was sparked by a horse kicking the side of the chamber with its metal shoes, authorities ruled.
Erica Marshall, an employee at Kesmarc Equine Rehabilitation facility in Marion County, died when the chamber she was running exploded on Feb. 10. Sorcha Moneley, 33, a visiting observer from Ireland, was wounded in the blast.
 
The sheriff's report said the horse, which also died, was wearing steel horseshoes inside the oxygen-rich chamber. Moneley told fire rescuers the horse kicked the inside walls, removing an inside protective layer and causing sparks before the explosion.

 


According to the sheriff's report, witnesses were at odds as to whether the horse had been sedated before entering the chamber, a precaution to lessen the chances of the animal kicking and causing damage.
 
Authorities at the scene said the end of the barn where the chamber had been housed was completely destroyed in the blast. Marshall's body was found buried in the rubble of the control room.
 
Facility manager Leonora Byrne told investigators horses are sent to the hyperbaric chamber for post-surgery rehabilitation, treatment for soft tissue damage or rest and relaxation.
  
Byrne also said Marshall had been trained to run the chamber and had been controlling it for about two years.
 
The horse that was in the chamber at the time of the explosion had been in it about four times before, Byrne told officials. She said some horses are given a mild sedative before being put in the chamber, but this particular horse had not been medicated.
 
Shoes not taped
However, Moneley told an investigator the horse had been given a sedative before being led into the chamber. She explained the horse's feet were fit with steel shoes that had not been taped or covered before he was brought for treatment, but said that was unnecessary since the inside of the chamber was lined with a protective coating.
 
Moneley said the horse had been in the chamber for about 20 minutes and had become unsettled. When it started kicking, a lid at the back of the chamber was dislodged and fell, revealing raw metal. The horse continued kicking, causing sparks. Moneley said she and Marshall noticed bigger sparks, then flames inside the chamber.
 
She said she left the area to call the fire department as Marshall prepared to bring the chamber to normal pressure, and that Marshall was "staring at the monitor and crying," according to the report.
 
Moneley then said she heard an initial blast and a second, larger explosion, which knocked her down and felt as though "hot gas had surrounded her," according to the report. A sheriff's office spokesperson told msnbc.com Moneley was tossed a considerable distance by the explosion. She suffered a head injury and was taken to a hospital in Gainesville. 

Marshall's funeral took place Thursday.

Discuss this post

As a horse owner for over 30 years, I believe any horse undergoing ongoing medical treatment should have their shoes pulled. Absolute tragedy.

  • 10 votes
#1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:16 AM EST
Comment author avatarChris-629698Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Are you a little strange? I've noticed that women who own horses usually tend to be a little touched...

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:21 AM EST

@Ashley - at least taped - there was no reason why the shoes shouldn't have been taped. I can understand them not removing them if the horse is going to be walking distances over hard surfaces (asphalt, concrete, etc.). Or even pull the steel ones and replace them with temporary polycarbonate - doesn't last very long, but it won't spark.

@Chris - totally uncalled for.

  • 12 votes
#1.2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:37 AM EST

Chris-629698 - Take another look at your See 'n Say. We are talking about horses, not (lots & lots of) cats.

  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:37 AM EST

@Chris, Still single aren't you? I find women who have horses actually tend to be very sane people. Can't say the same for you.

  • 8 votes
#1.4 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:48 AM EST

No, I'm happily dating a woman who doesn't have horses this time. I dated a girl with six Friesians a few years back and found her to be the most self-absorbed intolerable person who cared more about her horses than people. They're like crazy cat ladies (a nod to you, FoolKiller) but their cats weigh 1200 lbs.

  • 9 votes
#1.5 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:51 AM EST

Chris, you're a great troll. Glad you found another troll to date.

  • 10 votes
#1.6 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:53 AM EST

The joke used to go.....

Q. What goes clip clop clip clop clip clop clip BANG clip clop clip......?

A. Amish driveby shooting.

This is an explosive new punchline.

  • 6 votes
#1.7 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:07 PM EST

Talk about random! RIP

  • 1 vote
#1.8 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:09 PM EST

Chris...I think you were probably just intimidated by the size of the horses 'equipment'

  • 6 votes
#1.9 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:59 PM EST

Chris, I myself prefer women who own riding crops but have never ridden a horse.

  • 4 votes
#1.10 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:14 PM EST
  • 1 vote
#1.11 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:41 PM EST

While this is a certain tragedy, it was also clearly avoidable. The shoes should have been covered. The horse apparently wasn't properly sedated. A woman is dead, a woman is injured, a horse is gone and the equipment destroyed... Will this tragic outcome provide a lesson to prevent this from happening again?

  • 3 votes
#1.12 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:48 PM EST

Chris...I think you were probably just intimidated by the size of the horses 'equipment'

See what I mean? This horse-owning lady immediately went to talking about horses' penises. They're just not right in the head... it's like they think that's a natural place for everyone's thought process to go or something.

  • 4 votes
#1.13 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:57 PM EST

Chris, it's also not very normal to immediately attack someone for owning horses in a story about a tragedy involving horses. You sound like a sociopath, my condolences to your gf.

  • 3 votes
#1.14 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:38 PM EST

Hey Chris...who said I was a woman?? Ashley is my last name. Now, bring the socks back to Wal-Mart and put your clothes on.

  • 2 votes
#1.15 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:24 PM EST

Are you a little strange? I've noticed that women who own horses usually tend to be a little touched...

Chris-629698, you are suspended for a week for violating rule # 1 of the Code of Honor.

Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks.

  • 5 votes
#1.16 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:51 PM EST
Reply

Oxygen does not burn; it merely supports combustion. I would focus on what flammable materials were allowed in the hyperbaric chamber.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:33 AM EST

Just about anything burns in a pure oxygen environment, including aluminum, and horse hair for that matter.

  • 12 votes
#2.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:37 AM EST

beefstuinit - Exactly.

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:39 AM EST

The picture to me says explosion and not a significant fire. The material used to insulate the chamber most likely caught fire with some oxygen present and then the oxygen source demolished the building!

  • 2 votes
#2.3 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:40 AM EST

Sounds like the horse was pretty flammable.

  • 1 vote
#2.4 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:42 AM EST

Altazi, I think you may be thinging of the "fire triangle" here... In no way the same thing as this incident.

    #2.5 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:43 AM EST

    Pressurized Oxygen rich environment + spark = BOOM. nuff said

    • 7 votes
    #2.6 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:56 AM EST

    This is odd since this was supposed to be a 100% Oxygen environment. The only thing I can thik of (and it sounds funny) but the horse may have farted.

    Oxygen will not burn or explode on it's own, period.

    There had to be additional fuel of some sort in the chamber for this to happen.

    And YES the fire triangle is the same in all fires and environments.

    • 2 votes
    #2.7 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:07 PM EST

    In a pressurized oxygen environment, almost EVERYTHING is fuel - including the horse itself, and the materials from which the tank is built (refined metals). Many materials that we don't consider "flammable" actually burn AGGRESSIVELY in a pure, pressurized oxygen environment - something that NASA learned the hard way in the Apollo capsule fire that killed Gus Grissom, Ed White & Roger Chaffee (the Soviets had their pure oxygen fire, too, and they lost a cosmonaut). The horse and tank itself start to burn, the gases from the combustion cause the pressure to increase, which makes the combustion happen even faster, and you get a runaway reaction and a huge increase in pressure, and the tank ruptures violently.

    Messing around with pressurized oxygen is like handling snakes. If you screw up, it will bite you.

    • 9 votes
    #2.8 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:45 PM EST

    AG everything you say is correct. I suppose it would help to know how the interior of this chamber was built.

    If it were all metal, it would still be hard to ignite without a lower flash-point fuel than steel. But you are right, just about anything can and will happen in this type environment given the right circumstances.

    If a spark came in contact with the horse hair or legging material, bad things would progress from there.

    It may have very well been paint chips or any petroleum based medications on the animal as well.

    My main point was to let people know that it does take three things to make fire, and that oxygen in itself is not flammable.

      #2.9 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:42 PM EST
      Reply

      They shouldn't have been horsing around.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#3 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:03 PM EST

      Neigh-o!

        #3.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:01 PM EST
        Reply

        What a tragedy....

        • 2 votes
        Reply#4 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:06 PM EST

        I know, the girl who died wasn't bad looking. I hate when pretty people die.

          #4.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:54 PM EST

          I hate when shallow people live.

          • 15 votes
          #4.2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:38 PM EST

          Zing!

          • 9 votes
          #4.3 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:46 PM EST
          Reply

          Wow. I didn't even know they had chambers for animals. OSHA will likely require rubber hoof covers after this. Could these chambers be fitted with high volume tanks of regular compressed air that could be used to quickly push the pure oxygen out to reduce the flames should something happen? It might not save the animal from the fire but it might reduce the chance of an explosion.

          What about a sprinkler or extinguisher system?

            Reply#5 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:11 PM EST

            Regular air has oxygen in it, so that wouldn't help - it's the presence of more oxygen molecules, closer together (high pressure) that's the problem. You'd have to pump in a pure inert gas, like nitrogen. But if you did that, and you had something living in there, you might asphyxiate it.

            • 1 vote
            #5.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:56 PM EST
            Reply

            Reminds me of the time i was checking the gas level on the snowblower one dark winter night. I told my brother i could not see how much gas was in the tank and the dumb shiit handed me a bic lighter.

            • 8 votes
            Reply#6 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:18 PM EST

            LMAO!

              #6.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:40 PM EST
              Reply

              I'm still not clear on the explosion part of this story. Even in a pure oxygen environment, there has to be fuel to burn. Without that fuel being in the form of a vapor, objects will burn and burn rapidly, but not create an explosion. Being in a confined container, if the burning goes on long enough, I suppose it would create pressure to the extent of finally causing the container to rupture suddenly, which I guess you would describe as an explosion, but the sparks had to be in direct contact with a flamable fuel which in this case, that source is not too clear. The oxygen supply source can't explode...

              Why wouldn't there be fire suppression systems and even pressure blow off devices installed?

              Like others, I would expect metal shoes to be not allowed to begin with. They make rubber "boots" that can be placed over the shoes, but again the attachments of those is not guaranteed, so I would just make it a rule that they are not allowed in the chamber to begin with. It really isn't that hard to remove horse shoes... I have horses and I don't shoe any of them. I understand the need for them in some environments, but a horse undergoing rehabilitation or recovering from a medical procedure doesn't need shoes, IMO.

              Very stange story and hard to understand quite frankly...

              • 3 votes
              Reply#7 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:28 PM EST

              See my comment above - many materials we don't normally consider "fuel" become aggressively flammable in the presence of pure, pressurized oxygen - including the horse itself, and the tank itself (refined metals).

              • 1 vote
              #7.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:48 PM EST

              Someone suggest that perhaps the horse farted (and it does sound funny). Methane from a fart or a burp from an animal that size probably would be more than enough for an explosion.

              • 1 vote
              #7.2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:54 PM EST

              Tired One, you are mistaken. Pressurized oxygen can explode if an ignition source is present. The horse kicking the sides of the chamber with metal shoes is all it took. You started off by saying the explosion doesn't make sense, then you went on to say there has to be fuel to burn. Explosions can result in fire and fires can lead to explosions, but they are not one and the same.

              • 1 vote
              #7.3 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:38 PM EST
              Reply

              I imagine a horse fart in an oxygen chamber could be just about as much as a set up for an explosion as anything.

                Reply#8 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:36 PM EST

                hahahahahahaahaha..now thats funny..butt plug maybe as precaution?

                  #8.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:56 PM EST
                  Reply

                  Man, the girl who was running the chamber wasn't the brightest of bulbs, eh? I mean, there's a huge tank full of pressurized pure oxygen right next to you ON FIRE, and you stand there staring at the screen and crying? RUN! RUN!

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#9 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:56 PM EST

                  I can only imagine the poor girl stayed at the monitor and was crying because she was trying to do something about the horror of seeing a horse burned alive in front of her. Her last act was unselfish. What a terrible tragedy.

                  • 7 votes
                  #9.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:30 PM EST

                  Chris, the observer who did run to call for help was far enough away to survive but she didn't escape injury. From the picture this was a tremendous blast...

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:41 PM EST

                  Man, I wouldn't care if it was a chamber full of kittens and week-old fluffy lambs with rainbow-colored wool. If there's a burning tank of pressurized oxygen next to me, I'm running.

                    #9.3 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:00 PM EST

                    And that is the difference between you and Erica Marshall.

                    • 2 votes
                    #9.4 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:43 PM EST
                    Reply

                    I wonder like others what the source of the "explosion" was. My guess is that because the chamber was sealed, when the contents began to burn, the chamber ruptured. And no, a horse fart would not be enough to cause an explosion. It would burn, but not once it was quickly diluted, even in pure oxygen.

                    Once again, science education fails us: How many people still think Oxygen can burn? I mean burn in the traditional sense. Oh, and how long do you think the tape was going to last on steel shoes?

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#10 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:07 PM EST

                    Oxygen doesn't have to burn, it fuels combustion. Concentrated oxygen in a closed chamber + spark = BOOM

                      #10.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:43 PM EST

                      "Oxygen doesn't have to burn, it fuels combustion. Concentrated oxygen in a closed chamber + spark = BOOM"

                      Again - not quite true.

                      Concentrated Oxygen + spark + some sort of fuel = fire. Fire in an enclosed space = BOOM

                      The only question is what was the fuel? In a pressurised oxygen environment lots of things that we normally don't consider flammable can burn. Aluminium, horses etc. My guess would be that the chamber was lined with some sort of spray on plastic coating or paint? The horse was kicking that, making flakes of it, and sparks, it caught fire (fast because of all the oxygen) and over pressured the chamber. BOOM.

                      The fire triangle of Oxygen, fuel and ignition source still applies even in a pressurised oxygen system. But all 3 elements were there -> BOOM

                      Ian

                        #10.2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:26 PM EST
                        Reply

                        Holy crap! too sad for any more of a comment than that.

                          Reply#11 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:09 PM EST

                          Yepper, very tragic, indeed.

                          What was she distracted with, the visitor?

                          And not taping or bagging the metal shoes of a high volume methane generator and putting it in an oxygen rich atmosphere?

                          She wasn't thinking clearly, then as she found out the hard way... Methane + Oxygen + one spark = kablooey!

                          Too sad!

                            Reply#12 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:58 PM EST

                            I wish the headlines to every update on this story did not state The Horse Caused The Explosion.

                            These women appear to have had no idea how dangerous this was. They did not think the material on the inside coud be exposed - which is why they started skipping the plasic covers over the shoes. Not only could it be exposed, it was from simple kicks - common with athletic young horses.

                            Also - the was faulty pressure valves that those discussing this believe may have caused the horse to react violently after 3 sessions of not reacting.

                            They should have both been trained to know a single spark means to evacuate.

                            The horse did not cause this. Human error did and by that, I do not mean the women so much as what they believed they were trained to do was correct.

                            I hope CNN follows up with OSHA and that all involved pay dearly - and that the woman who survived is well compensated.

                              Reply#13 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:21 PM EST

                              I'm sorry anytime someone looses their Life needlessly. But we have to draw the line somewhere when it comes to our obsession with animals.

                              We are the only creature on this planet that confines animals against their own free will for our amusement. I am not talking about food and I am not talking about endangered species for which most are endangered due to our existence and thus we owe them something.

                              I am talking about just how much money the World over is spent not only to breed or capture our pets, (yes, I plead guilty to have owned some pets over the years when I had the resources, housing and physical ability to properly care for them). But to care for them long after they would have past on in the Wild.

                              We have destroyed many breeds of animals with our obsession for cross-breeding. We put billions into food and medicine to care for them. I am putting this out there, not to slam anybody. Just that we all need to think about our priorities on this planet.

                              I could make my share of smart ass comments or plead for the Humane treatment of animals. Rather that, I'd just like us all to start treating each other with the same love, respect and care as we treat our pets.

                                Reply#14 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 8:47 PM EST

                                The educator’s dilemma: (Good Bad or Just the Most Basic, Oxygen’s Role)

                                Brooklyn Bridge Caisson Fire: (The notion that fires occur without mentioning oxygen or that compression of Air (20% Oxygen, 80% Nitrogen) by factor of 5 five does not increase combustibility, and the oxygen is somehow secondary to the fire, just indicates how poor the result of education are. Instead of just saying that Oxygen is the more significant than the spark that sets the fire then consumes material and therefore Oxygen can be dangerous, we go a about saying that oxygen is good, vital and health developing a common notion that in turn misleads us in long term complacency, leading to surprise and tragedy. We spend lots of resources saying how dangerous this or that other thing, doing anything to educate other than by rote.)

                                NASA School Demonstrations: Before the Apollo Fire, NASA sent representative to High Schools to perform demonstrations with Liquid Oxygen, among those demonstrations, were how rapidly a cigarette would burn after being immersed in liquid oxygen – poof gone -, and making a hammer from liquid mercury and then using it to drive a nail into board.

                                Cutting Torch/Lance: The welders cutting torch using H2C2 (acetylene) is ignited by a sparking device, the gas initially produces yellow flame and trail of soot. When the low volume oxygen is turned on to produce an intense flame. The flame is placed in near contact with iron/steel, heating the iron/steel to incandescence, once heated to melting the iron/steel catches on fire. At this point the welder can turn off the H2C2 gas boost the oxygen and the cutting process continues with pure oxygen by burning the iron/steel. Note that the iron/steel is NOT cut by melting steel, but by the burning steel to ferric oxide (FE2O3). The thickness of the steel that can be cut this way is astonishing, spanning many inches!

                                The internal combustion engine: Operates by compressing air (and fuel) by ratio 5 - 9 to 1, increasing the partial pressure of oxygen from 3 to 15-27 psi (20% concentration oxygen in Air (0.20*15psi) = 3psi, Nitrogen’s 80% (.80*15psi) = 12psi. This is roughly equivalent to having pure oxygen in the cylinder (and fuel). This could ignite by itself, but normal ignition is controlled by a spark plug, (hot spot in diesel). There are hundreds of millions vehicles doing the every day.

                                Atmospheric Science: The steady concentration of Oxygen in the atmosphere is a good starting point. We should know that oxygen is produced by plants, more so in summer, and constantly in the tropics and broadly in the Oceans. We should know that animals breathe oxygen, and that internal combustion engine consumes oxygen, fireplaces, forest fires, and industrial processes in vast quantities. It seems enough to balance the concentration, but could we be missing something, since it seems a very precise and steady concentration. As it turns out plant materials namely cellulose, when plant die and decay back into the soil the cellulose become peat, the same kind as we put in garden soil, but you may not know that peat vanishes into thin air, well not really but dry peat oxidizes in air having an Oxygen concentration of about 20%. A simple experiment can demonstrate the process, place a small quantity of dry peat moss in a mason or tomato sauce jar and place it in sunny window for few months, and take a look. It could be possible to measure the dry peat before and after, but this is beyond the precision of home implements. The simple point is that oxygen production and consumption varies too much to explain the constant value for oxygen concentration. Now you may also have heard that oxygen concentrations millions of years ago were higher, but it also reported that cellulose is a newer product that as not so wide spread as it is now?

                                Oxygen Blindness: We can appreciate the advances in the care of premature infants, but it was tragedy discovered when infants were placed given oxygen, it stimulated growth in blood vessels in the eyes and prevented the eyes from developing properly, and the result was impaired vision or blindness.

                                If I hadn’t seen it twice I wouldn’t have believed it: Having spent too much time gardening, tilling the soil, and tromping the occasional worm, that later dried in the hot sun, I was surprised twice by seeing the desiccated dead work vanish like a burning cigarette, and short lived flames. And I still do not believe it.

                                Oxygen doesn’t burn … therefore it is safe? No it is not safe, and it takes human intervention to keep it safe. But since it occurs so rarely the public masses are expected to remain ignorant.

                                Plausible Speculation: The horse came from a barn, trailer, pasture, on as sunny day (?). Horses are lovely animals, feeding on hay and grain, and after chewing toughly leave road apples. Over time these filaments of cellulose, dry and drift about. The horse is likely to be covered with dust and have those cellulose particles stuck everywhere. Next we challenge safety, by placing the animal dust and all into hyper-baric oxygen chamber. The news article did not mention if 100% oxygen was used, or what the pressure was applied. But it seems quite possible that the combustible materials were introduced into the chamber, and began to burn of their own accord. Yes the horse would be frighten and would kick wildly, sparks or no sparks, steel or no steel.

                                Conclusion: The horse began kicking after smelling smoke or feeling fire, the attendant cried because she knew what was happening. The horse caught in fire as was trapped, the heat and expanding gas and burning horse flesh over pressurized the chamber and the whole mess exploded. One person died, an animal died.

                                Suggestion or Solution: The obviousness of this incident (hindsight), is not the least bit that obvious, but knowing, accepting or proving what I have said here would be harder to prove than the solution. The animal being placed in such a chamber could be misted, wetted or lathered in moisture, to make sure that combustible matter cellulose cannot burst into flames. [Noting: Hospital Operating Rooms have caught fire for reasons of complacency.]

                                Wikipedia Apollo Fire:

                                Apollo 1 (also designated Apollo Saturn-204 and AS-204) was scheduled to be the first manned mission of the Apollo manned lunar landing program, with a target launch date of February 21, 1967. A cabin fire during a launch pad test on January 27 at Launch Pad 34 at Cape Canaveral killed all three crew members – Command Pilot Virgil "Gus" Grissom, Senior Pilot Edward H. White and Pilot Roger B. Chaffee – and destroyed the Command Module.[1] The mission name Apollo 1, chosen by the crew, was officially retired by NASA in commemoration of them on April 24, 1967.[1]

                                ...

                                Wikipedia Other oxygen fires: (Note the Dates)

                                Several fires in high-oxygen environments had been known to occur prior to the Apollo fire. For example, in 1962, USAF Colonel B. Dean Smith was conducting a test of the Gemini space suit with a colleague in a pure oxygen chamber at Brooks Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, when a fire broke out, destroying the chamber. Smith and his partner narrowly escaped.[30]

                                Other oxygen fire occurrences are documented in certain US reports archived in the National Air and Space Museum,[31] such as:

                                Selection of Space Cabin Atmospheres. Part II: Fire and Blast Hazaards [sic] in Space Cabins. (Emanuel M. Roth; Dept of Aeronautics Medicine and Bioastronautics, Lovelace Foundation for Medical Education and Research. c.1964-1966.)

                                "Fire Prevention in Manned Spacecraft and Test Chamber Oxygen Atmospheres." (MSC. NASA General Working Paper 10 063. October 10, 1966)

                                On January 28, 1986, the Soviet Union disclosed that cosmonaut Valentin Bondarenko died after a fire in a high-oxygen isolation chamber on March 23, 1961, less than three weeks before the first Vostok manned space flight.[32][33][34] This revelation caused some speculation whether the Apollo 1 disaster might have been averted had NASA been aware of the incident.[35]

                                  Reply#15 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 9:43 AM EST

                                  Good conclusion. I suspect a similar conclusion. Horse passed some gas - was not feeling well, methane built up, he became more uncomfortable in the confines, started kicking to give the sign that he wanted "out", too late; the spark occurred, and yes, the horror of this beautiful horse, which Mrs. Marshall probably spent much time with, on fire - paralyzed her which unfortunately took her life. No time to "re-group" and evacuate. Very sad and tragic.

                                    #15.1 - Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:57 PM EST
                                    Reply
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.