• Heroic Vietnam War soldier awarded posthumous Medal of Honor

    The U.S. Army Specialist will posthumously receive the award for his actions in the Vietnam War in 1970. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

    President Barack Obama presented the country’s highest military decoration to the family of Army Spc. Leslie H. Sabo Jr., who was killed protecting fellow soldiers from an ambush in Cambodia during the Vietnam War.

    The 22-year-old Army rifleman killed several North Vietnamese soldiers, shielded a comrade from a grenade blast and forced a retreat in a battle that took place on May 10, 1970.

    The Medal of Honor was awarded to Sabo’s widow, Rose Mary Sabo-Brown,  in the East Room of the White House.

    "He saved  his comrades who meant more to him than life, Obama said at the ceremony, while also saluting other Vietnam War veterans. Members of Sabo's unit, Bravo Company, were in attendance and received a standing ovation.


    "A piece of metal won't bring back my husband," Sabo-Brown told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review in an interview. "But my heart beams with pride for Leslie because he's finally getting what's due to him. I will show it proudly for him for the rest of my life."

    Spc. 4 Leslie H. Sabo Jr. is shown during his tour with Company B, 3rd Battalion, 506th Infantry, 101st Airborne Division. He will receive the Medal of Honor May 16 for his valor in Vietnam.

    The records of the Pennsylvania man's heroics were lost in military archives for decades before being re-discovered in 1999 by a magazine writer researching Vietnam era Medal of Honor winners.

    Related: Soldier to receive posthumous Medal of Honor for heroic actions in 1970 Cambodia battle

    Sabo’s platoon was on patrol in the Se San River valley in Cambodia when they were ambushed by a larger North Vietnamese force.

    Sabo quickly charged and killed several enemy soldiers. Then, according to the White House, Sabo rushed at another oncoming flanking force and drew fire away from American troops, forcing the North Vietnamese to retreat.

    As Sabo was reloading his rifle, a grenade landed nearby. He picked it up, threw it and shielded a fellow soldier with his own body. Wounded from the blast and enemy fire, he continued to fight, storming an enemy emplacement and throwing another grenade. The grenade explosion silenced the enemy, but also killed Sabo, the White House said.

    Sabo’s remains were shipped home in a body bag marked “Remains Unfit for Viewing,” his hometown newspaper, the Ellwood City Ledger, reported. His father and namesake died in 1977 without knowing the full story of his son’s death.

    A citation recommending Sabo for the Medal of Honor was lost after the war, but resurfaced in 1999 when Alton “Tony” Mabb, a writer for a military association magazine, was researching Vietnam-era Medal of Honor winners at the National Archives.

    Mabb contacted Sabo's widow and met with her and other members of his platoon at the Vietnam Veteran's War Memorial in Washington, D.C., in 2002, according to an account in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Mabb also contacted U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown, who wrote the Defense Department requesting that Sabo's actions be recognized. In 2006, Sabo was recommended for the Medal of Honor by the Secretary of the Army.

    It took an act of Congress to extend the time limit for the medal, which was passed in the 2008 defense authorization act.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

     

  • Steven Powell found guilty on 14 counts of voyeurism

    Ted S. Warren / AP

    Steve Powell looks toward his attorneys during the day of final arguments in his voyeurism trial, Tuesday, May 15, 2012, in Tacoma, Wash.

    TACOMA, Wash. -- A jury found Steven Powell guilty Wednesday on 14 counts of voyeurism for taking pictures of girls and women in various states of undress for the purpose of sexual gratification. The charges stemmed from an investigation into his missing daughter-in-law.

    Defense attorneys had argued that there was too much reasonable doubt in the case to convict Powell, but jurors disagreed, finding him guilty on all counts.


    Powell is the former father-in-law of Susan Powell, who has been missing since December 2009. Her husband, Josh Powell, who is Steven's son, was a person of interest in her disappearance. He killed himself and the couple's two children in an explosion in Graham, Wash., earlier this year.

    Steven Powell's sentencing hearing was scheduled for June 15. He faces a standard sentence of about four years, but the state has alleged aggravating factors that could result in a longer term.

    Authorities brought the voyeurism charges last year after searching Steve Powell's home during their investigation into the disappearance of Susan Powell in Utah. 

    Jurors questioned evidence during deliberations, asking if a disc of pictures was found in boxes containing only Steve Powell's belongings.

    Watch the video and read the full story on King5.com

    Evidence used by prosecutors included photos of young girls in bathrooms, girls changing clothes and at least one video of Powell allegedly touching himself. The photo corresponding to each charge was shown once again to jurors during the prosecution's closing arguments.

    Defense attorneys argued reasonable doubt exists and that, "this case is not about what you feel, it's about what you know."

    The photos were found on Powell's computer last fall when police searched his Puyallup home. At the time, Powell's former daughter-in-law, Susan Powell, had been missing for nearly two years. Officers were looking for her journals.

    A child pornography charge against Steven Powell was thrown out last week.

    Photos of Susan Powell were tossed out as evidence because she was not considered one of the alleged victims in the voyeurism case.

    King 5-TV and msnbc.com staff contributed to this report.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

  • Family wins $323 million against Iran, Syria over terrorist attack

    View more videos at: http://nbcmiami.com.

    A Weston, Fla., family has won a landmark $323 million court decision against Iran and Syria, six years after their son was killed by a suicide bomber in Tel Aviv. When they’ll see the money is another matter.

    A U.S. federal judge awarded Tuly and Cheryl Wultz the judgment against Iran for financially supporting the Islamic Jihad movement and Syrian for allowing the group to train in its territory. The lawsuit was filed by an Israeli advocacy group on behalf of the family. The award includes $300 million in punitive damages.

    Tuly Wultz remembers like it was yesterday how the terrorist looked moments before the April 17, 2006, blast that killed his son, Daniel, when they were vacationing in Israel. They were having lunch in Tel Aviv when the suicide bomber approached, standing 2 feet away from Daniel Wultz, 16.


    Read the original story at NBCMiami.com

    “I tried to jump on Daniel but he already detonated and the bomb was over 40 pounds of explosives,” Tuly Wultz recalled in an interview with NBC Miami. He was severely injured, and his son and 10 other people were killed in the attack by an Islamic Jihad militant.

    “My heart is still bleeding for Daniel. I’ll never be recovered from that,” the father said.

    He said of Daniel Wultz, “He did what is right, he did what is justice.”

    Daniel Wultz died from his injuries on May 14, 2006.

    On Monday, the sixth anniversary of his death, his parents received word of the court victory.

    Wultz Attorney Robert Tolchin told msnbc.com that with the court judgment in hand his clients can seek Iranian and Syrian assets to collect the award.

    Tolchin said he couldn’t be specific, but he would explore “various avenues.”

    “There is a lot of litigation by people seeking the turnover of Iranian assets,” Tolchin said. “The Iranians have kept U.S. courts busy.”

    As in the Wultz case, Iran often does not fight against a judgment, but hires major U.S. firms to fight the collection of the award, Tolchin said.

    Syria, on the other hand, did fight the claim and was represented in court by former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark.

    The case was brought under a special provision of federal law that allows U.S. citizens to take court actions against foreign states providing support for terrorism.

    “Iran and Syria are foreign states with substantial wealth and that have expended significant resources sponsoring terrorism,” wrote Judge Royce C. Lamberth in his ruling.

    “Barbaric acts like the April 17, 2006 suicide bombing have no place in civilized society and represent a moral depravity that knows no bounds.”

    The Wultzes say they are pleased with the decision, which they say is just one step towards justice and a way to ensure their son’s death was not in vain.

    “This judgment was important because it’s the first time that there’s a judgment that concerns terrorism against Syria,” Cheryl Wultz said.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

  • Trio lured Marine wife to her death, prosecutors say

    NBC San Diego

    Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino, 36, appeared in a Vista courtroom to face a murder charge for allegedly aiding and abetting in Brittany Killgore's murder, prosecutors charged.

    Prosecutors say a trio of defendants lured a North County, Calif., Marine wife to go on a dinner cruise but had different plans for her in the hours before her death.

    New details were revealed in court Tuesday about what may have happened to Brittany Killgore, the 22-year-old Fallbrook resident who was last seen alive on April 13, wearing a purple evening gown.

    Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino, 36, appeared in court to face a murder charge for allegedly aiding and abetting in Killgore's murder, prosecutors charged. She stood quietly in court staring at the ground with half her face covered by hair.

    Brittany Dawn Killgore

    Maraglino is pregnant, according to a law enforcement source, who added that she is due in August.


    Her alleged co-conspirators, Jessica Lynn Lopez, 25, and U.S. Marine Staff Sgt. Louis Perez, 45, have pleaded not guilty to murder in previous court appearances.

    Deputy District Attorney Patrick Espinoza said Maraglino was involved in every part of the crime, from the planning to the execution.

    Read original story on NBCSanDiego.com

    Killgore's body was found abandoned on the side of the road on April 17, four days after she was reported missing. The last communication anyone received from Killgore was a text on April 13 that read "help."

    Prosecutors said Maraglino called Killgore April 13 to convince her to go on a boat cruise, but it was just a ruse.

    Killgore did not want to go with Maraglino, prosecutors said, because she knew the defendant didn't like her.

    However, Killgore agreed to go with Perez and got in the car with him. It was during that ride, prosecutors claim, that Killgore texted the word "help" to a friend.

    Within minutes, according to investigators, Perez had texted Maraglino, asking her to meet him at a home she owned. Maraglino bought the home in December 2009, according to the North County Times. At some point, she shared the home with Lopez and Perez.

    Investigators searched the residence several times in the days after Killgore's body was discovered, taking photos, removing evidence bags and even watching video tapes, according to neighbors.

    Click here for timeline from NBCSanDiego.com: Brittany Killgore case

    At a hearing last month, a prosecutor said investigators found Killgore’s blood and a weapon in Perez's car.

    An incriminating note?
    Authorities said Killgore's body was discovered in brush near Lake Skinner, only hours after paramedics were called to a San Diego motel and found another woman -- who turned out to be Jessica Lynn Lopez -- with self-inflicted cuts and a suicide note.

    The suicide note reportedly refers to Maraglino as "Mistress" and Lopez as "Master." The San Diego Union Tribune published a report saying its staff had a copy of the handwritten note along with reaction from Lopez' attorney Sloan Ostbye, who said the contents of the letter should not be believed.

    “Master I am so sorry I dragged you into this,” the letter reads. “I thought I was defending the family and it would be simple like Dexter.”

    "Dexter" likely refers to the television show "Dexter," which depicts a serial killer.

    Lopez admits in the letter to binding and strangling Killgore, and then dumping her body near Lake Skinner.

    The prosecutor said Lopez and Perez once lived together but didn't indicate when or where. Lopez currently lives a mile from Killgore's second-floor apartment overlooking Camp Pendleton.

    Maraglino and Perez practiced sadomasochism and bondage, according to online profiles posted by the two, reported The San Diego Union Tribune. Maraglino is described online as Perez's "sex slave," said the paper.

    Perez has lived in San Diego County for 10 years and has a wife there.

    Authorities have revealed no link between Kilgore and the sadomasochistic lifestyle, said the Tribune. She was "an innocent victim," Espinoza told the court.

    Homicide detectives said Maraglino’s arrest – the third in Killgore’s case – was made as a result of information and evidence obtained throughout the ongoing investigation.

    The judge set bail for her at $3 million.

    Killgore recently separated from Marine Lance Cpl. Cory Killgore, who was in Afghanistan when she disappeared. She cited irreconcilable differences in her divorce filing but gave no other details.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

  • Hawaii first state to ban plastic bags at checkout

    By now, it’s hardly news when a city bans plastic bags at checkout counters -- but an entire state? That’s happened in Hawaii, where Honolulu County has joined the state’s three other counties to give Hawaii a first-in-the-nation title.

    "Passing the bans did take an effort -- change always does -- but people seemed to understand the need for such an effort," Robert Harris, director of the Sierra Club's Hawaii chapter, told msnbc.com of the two-year campaign across the islands.

    The Honolulu County Council approved the ban late last month and Honolulu Mayor Peter Carlisle, who is also the county executive, initially held back his support, saying he wanted to collect more public input due to enforcement and cost concerns.


    But when he signed the ban on Thursday, Carlisle was fully committed, especially since retailers were given three years to comply.

    "This is groundbreaking. By signing this environmentally friendly bill, Honolulu joined our neighbor island counties," Carlisle said. "Hawaii has become the only state in the United States where every county has plastic bag legislation."

    One man's trash is another man's treasure. Richard Lang and Judith Selby Lang are harvesting the plastic refuse littered on California's Kehoe Beach and turning it into beautiful, unique works of art. NBC's Mike Leonard reports.

    The county law bans non-biodegradable plastic bags at checkout as well as paper bags that are not at least 40 percent recycled. Retailers in Honolulu County have until July 1, 2015, to make the change.

    That date "gives us plenty of time to get ready," Carlisle told msnbc.com. "Retailers will be able to use up their inventory of bags and make arrangements to educate the public on the importance of bringing their own bag."

    Live Poll

    What do you think about Hawaii's ban on plastic bags?

    View Results
    • 183742
      I'm for it -- it's a smart environmental move
      84%
    • 183743
      I'm against it -- Government shouldn't be involved in this matter
      16%

    VoteTotal Votes: 3776

    Kauai and Maui counties already enforce bans, while Hawaii County's ban takes effect on Jan. 17, 2013. 

    The Sierra Club organized rallies to support the bans, said Harris. "We also lobbied extensively for statewide legislation, which failed, but it helped direct attention to the issue and eventually got the last county to take action."

    "Being a marine state, perhaps, we are exposed more directly to the impacts of plastic pollution and the damage it does to our environment," Harris said in explaining the support in all four counties. "People in Hawaii are more likely to be in the water or in the outdoors and see the modern day tumbleweed -- plastic bags -- in the environment."

    Getting shoppers to switch to reusable bags is another matter.

    Island supermarkets, which said they would prefer to charge a nickel or dime for plastic bags rather than live with a ban, argued that most shoppers have shifted to paper bags, which have their own environmental impact and increase store costs. 

    The Surfrider Foundation, which also lobbied for the bans as part of its mission to protect beaches and oceans, acknowledged the challenge ahead.

    Interactive: The paper or plastic debate

    "While we are excited that the plastic bag bans have been enacted, there has been a reported increase in paper bag use from locals," Bill Hickman, the nonprofit's point man in Hawaii for plastics, said in a blogpost Monday. He added that his group might even lobby for a fee on paper bags at some point.

    The state-level legislation, which would have charged users 10 cents per plastic bag, died a quiet death earlier this month, just two weeks after being introduced. A statewide ban also recently failed in California, noted Harris. 

    Ted Duboise, publisher of PlasticBagBanReport.com, said he doesn't think any state is close to a ban enforced at the state level. "Too much political hem haw," he told msnbc.com.

    As for a national ban, don't hold your breath, said Duboise, citing "labor, lobbyist and plastic industry interests."

    Still, the number of areas with bans or bag fees has grown across the U.S. and the globe. Dozens of areas on every continent but Antarctica are listed on an interactive map at PlasticBagBanReport.com.

    So is the lesson here that it's easier to get bans at the local level?

    "In Hawaii, yes," said Harris. "And looking to the mainland, I would suspect the same."

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

  • Illinois police on the hunt for groom of slain bride found in bathtub

    Just two days after her wedding, Estrella Carrera, 25, was found stabbed to death in her own bathtub. She was still in the dress she wore at her wedding reception. WMAQ-TV's Lauren Jiggetts reports.

    Burbank, Ill., police are on the hunt for the husband of a newlywed woman found stabbed to death in her bathtub over the weekend.

    Arnoldo Jimenez, 30, and Estrella Carrera, 26, were married on Friday, just two days before Carerra's body was found by authorities during a search prompted by worried family members.


    Jimenez hasn't been seen since, officials said. A Cook County judge issued a warrant for his arrest on Tuesday.

    Still wearing wedding dress, woman stabbed to death in bathtub

    Following a City Hall wedding ceremony, the newlyweds rented a party limo and celebrated their new union with a group of friends and family, ending the evening at a night club on the north side of Chicago, officials said.

    The pair were last seen together at about 4 a.m. Saturday, officials said. Roughly 36 hours later, Carerra's body was found. Officials confirmed she was still wearing her silver-sequined wedding dress.

    "It was a very brutal killing," Capt. Joseph Ford of the Burbank Police Department told The Associated Press Tuesday. "We do our jobs every day, of course. But something like this really motivates you to work even harder."

    Investigators said there were no signs of forced entry into the bride's apartment.

    Jimenez was known to be driving a black, four-door 2006 Maserati with Illinois license plates. According to The Associated Press, he had tried to keep the impending wedding secret from most of Carrera's family.

    Carerra called one of her cousins, Sandy Lopez, and invited her to the party but said nothing about a wedding, The Associated Press reported.

    "She didn't want to tell me she had gotten married," she said. "She didn't tell anybody besides her father the day before." 

    The couple had reportedly been dating for two years prior to getting married. Carrera had two children, aged two and nine.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

  • Defense rests without calling John Edwards or Rielle Hunter

    John Edwards' defense team concluded it had poked enough holes in the prosecution's case that it didn't need to call Edwards or Rielle Hunter to the stand. NBC's Lisa Myers reports from Greensboro, N.C.

    Updated at 2:20 p.m. ET: Lawyers for former Sen. John Edwards rested their case in his campaign finance corruption trial Wednesday morning without calling Edwards or his onetime mistress, Rielle Hunter.


    Lisa Myers, Stacey Klein and Michael Austin of NBC News and Ben Edwards of NBC station WCNC of Charlotte, N.C., contributed to this report by M. Alex Johnson of msnbc.com. Follow M. Alex Johnson on Twitter and Facebook.


    Crowds had lined up two hours before court opened in Greensboro, N.C., anticipating they might get an opportunity to hear from the principal players after defense lawyers told U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles late Tuesday that they might call Edwards, Hunter and Edwards' daughter Cate Edwards Upham to the stand on Wednesday.

    Jurors were dismissed for the day, but the trial isn't over yet: The prosecution now has the opportunity to call rebuttal witnesses, followed by closing arguments from both sides. 


    It was a subdued ending to the defense phase of Edwards' trial on six felony counts of accepting about $1 million in illegal and unreported campaign donations from two wealthy supporters at a time when federal election law limited individual political contributions to $2,300 for the election cycle. The decision surprised spectators and legal analysts alike, many of whom had predicted that Upham would certainly testify and that Edwards was likely to.

    "Remember, the defense told this jury John Edwards is not afraid of the truth, and I think that was foretelling that he will take the stand," said Kieran Shanahan, a former federal prosecutor who is closely watching the trial.

    Abbe Lowell, Edwards' lead attorney, rested after Eagles denied another attempt by the defense to introduce evidence that Donald McGahn, a member of the Federal Election Commission, disagrees with the government's theory that the payments for Hunter constituted illegal campaign contributions.

    Watch US News videos on msnbc.com

    Lowell tried to introduce an audiotape of McGahn saying at a July 2011 FEC meeting that, even assuming everything the government claims is true, the payments were contributions that should have been reported.

    The audio is available here from the FEC's website.

    But Eagles said, "I don't think the opinions of others ... are particularly helpful to this jury" — essentially the same reasoning she gave last week in ruling out testimony from former FEC members who had been expected to say they also thought the contributions were legal.

    The jury was left with the final testimony of Jim Walsh, a former FBI agent hired by the defense who traced the money trail.

    Walsh testified Tuesday that Edwards' friend Fred Baron, finance director for his presidential campaign, gave Hunter monthly payments totaling $74,000 in the second half of 2008 — well after the campaign had ended and some of it even after Edwards publicly admitted the affair.

    Former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards has faced public and private challenges throughout his life and career.

    "The only logical reason for making these payments at the time they were made was exactly what John Edwards has been saying: 'I'm trying to protect my wife from finding out that I'm the father of Rielle Hunter's baby,'" Shanahan said.

    Another major point of the defense argument is that Edwards didn't know what the money from Baron and billionaire oil heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon was being used for, a contention that was supported Tuesday by John Moylan, who worked in both of Edwards' presidential campaigns.

    Moylan testified that Edwards was shocked to learn in August 2008 — several months after the fact — that Mellon had been paying to help support Hunter and keep her from the public eye. The money was given through checks falsely labeled as furniture purchases through Andrew Young, who was once a top aide to Edwards and is now his chief accuser.

    Referring to Young as "that damn Andrew," Edwards told Mellon, "Bunny, you should not be sending money to anyone," Moylan testified.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

  • Oregon mom sued by church over online criticism

    An Oregon pastor, upset with online comments made by former church members, sues four former parishioners, seeking $500,000 for defamation. KGW's Wayne Havrelly reports.

    An Oregon mother of seven is being sued for defamation by her former church over critical comments she made online.

    Julie Anne Smith, a stay-at-home mom who home-schools her children, said church members began shunning her and her family after they left Beaverton Grace Bible Church almost four years ago.

    She took to the Web in October 2009 to air her concerns about the church's practices on Google reviews, but said her comments kept being pushed down by other church members' more recent reviews. So in February of this year, Smith launched a blog called Beaverton Grace Bible Church Survivors to counteract what she called the "cat and mouse game" on Google.

    "My primary issue was to discuss spiritual abuse in the church,” Smith told msnbc.com. “In essence, the legal suit is [O'Neal's] attempt of continuing that spiritual abuse.”


    But days after Smith launched her blog, pastor Charles O'Neal filed a $500,000 lawsuit against Smith, her daughter and three other former church members, claiming some of the comments posted online amounted to defamation. O'Neal has been the pastor of the church for 13 years.

    "We have not gone hastily to court," O'Neal said in a statement released to msnbc.com. "For three and a half years this group has been engaged in a public, church to church, and World Wide Web defamation, showing their willingness to discredit God, harm the church, harm wives, harm children, and harm the testimony of Christ's Gospel."

    "It is BGBC's firm conviction that this cannot continue," he added.

    In reaction to O'Neal's lawsuit, Smith's attorney filed an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss the suit. The motion, which is meant to protect individuals sued for exercising their constitutionally protected rights, will go before a judge on May 21.

    Defamation lawsuits triggered by online comments are not unusual, but they typically involve businesses, American Civil Liberties Union attorney Aden Fine told msnbc.com.

    "It’s very clear, especially in the age of the Internet, that companies don’t like to be criticized and don’t want the world to see this criticism, and so many companies have been very aggressive about suing people for criticizing them," Fine said.

    "The result will be that people will be afraid of posting critical comments on the Internet," he said, adding that he expects these kinds of lawsuits to happen more even frequently in the future.

    Smith, who used to play piano at the Beaverton church, said she and her family were asked to leave the congregation in November 2008, but it was almost a year before she took her grievances online. Church leaders, however, deny ever asking the Smiths to leave and claim her family left of their own accord.

    “When you’re in a cult or a spiritually abusive place, your brain takes a while to process, to uncover all of that stuff that was going on, so I was kinda stewing,” she said. "Things were coming clear to me.”

    Shunned?
    Smith said the shunning by church members was so extreme that one of them even skidded out of a grocery parking lot to avoid her. "They treat you worse than a stranger," she said. "It just seems so cruel.”

    She said her eldest daughter, Hannah, even left home about 4.5 years ago because she no longer wanted anything to do with the church. "My daughter willingly gave up many things to protect her sanity and leave the place that was emotionally killing her," Smith wrote on her blog.

    Smith said she tried calling and emailing the church to resolve the conflict, but received no response.

    The decision to eventually start posting reviews on Google came “out of desperation.”

    "The mama bear in me came out," she said.

    According to the complaint filed by the pastor, the defamatory statements included claims that O'Neal had "chosen to mislead the congregation" and "destroy relationships." Other messages quoted in the filing say the pastor is an example of "narcissism in the pulpit," and the church is "creepy" and uses "control tactics" for "spiritual abuse."

    "You will be fine at this church if you never question the elders or pastor," the filing quotes another statement as saying.

    Other comments Smith reportedly posted online state the church is "very destructive and disturbing."

    "Leaders of cults convince their people that their church is the only true place to be..." and "turn a blind eye to known sex offenders in the church," Smith reportedly posted on Jan. 4.

    O'Neal's attorney told msnbc.com in an email that the latter claim is "the second worst thing that any pastor can be accused of."

    Court documents revealed the sex offender claim refers to a mentally disabled teenage church member who allegedly touched one of his sisters inappropriately. His family brought the matter up with the pastor, who said the boy "was never again allowed in the church nursery and never allowed to be alone in the company of children around the church.”

    Smith said some of her statements were taken out of context in the filing, but she said she stands by everything she wrote.

    Abuse 'unfounded'
    Court filings state that another defendant, Meaghan Varela, allegedly made accusations of child abuse against the pastor, which led to a December 2008 visit from the Oregon Department of Human Services. The social worker informed O'Neal's daughter that someone also reported that pornography was being distributed to children at church.

    "The allegations of child abuse filed by Meaghan Varela were extremely painful to my family," O'Neal's daughter said in a statement.

    The DHS concluded that the child abuse allegations were "unfounded," court papers say.

    ACLU's Fine said the court will look at whether the defendants' statements qualify as opinions or assertions of fact. Opinions are protected under free speech law.

    Smith told msnbc.com she received messages of support from church members, and some told her they would like to post online about their own concerns but they're afraid.

    "They've seen what happened to me," Smith said. "[O'Neal] sued me."

    “He’s trying to bully people," she added.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook 

  • Graveyard dating back to 19th century found below California construction site

    A hospital expansion project in San Jose, Calif., has been halted after constructions crews unearthed more than 1,000 coffins filled with the bodies of people whose families couldn't afford proper burials. The pine boxes date back to between 1875 and 1935. KNTV's Kimberly Tere reports.

    Construction at a portion of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center has stopped in San Jose, Calif., because crews have unearthed pine boxes filled with the bodies of those whose families couldn't afford their proper burials, NBC Bay Area has learned.

    The pine boxes date back to between 1875 and 1935, and were discovered in February when construction crews were doing seismic survey work, Santa Clara County counsel Michael Rossi said Tuesday.


    For more, visit NBCBayArea.com.

    He said the county had no idea there was a cemetery on the property.

    "It’s a potter’s field or a pauper’s graveyard. Between 1875 and 1935 at Valley Medical Center, people who died indigent, whose families couldn’t be found were buried at this site," Rossi said.

    There are as many as 1,445 bodies on the site. The county filed a petition with the court to get permission to remove at least 100 of the pine coffins to make room for construction.

    The county is looking into hiring an archaeologist who specializes in this type of find, Rossi said.

    If anything identifiable is found, Rossi said they would publish the information in the newspaper to give families time to claim the remains.

    After that, the county will ask the court's permission to dispose of the bodies in accordance to law.

    A county map from 1932 shows the cemetery, but by 1958 there was no indication it existed. By 1966, there was an employee parking lot on top of the cemetery.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

  • Stimulus dollars funded erectile dysfunction study in California

    This may not have been the type of "stimulus" feds intended.

    Two grants totaling nearly $1.5 million were distributed to the University of California San Francisco, NBCBayArea.com has discovered. The money was part of the federal stimulus program and went to studies into the erectile dysfunction of overweight middle aged men and the accurate reporting of someone's sexual history.

    This is part of our ongoing series of investigations by the NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit into who got federal stimulus dollars, and why some projects did not break ground more than two years after receiving the grant.

    The Investigative Unit looked closely at the federal government's decision to spend nearly $1.5 million of taxpayer money, money that came here to California. Grant number 1R01HD056950-01A2 was among the thousands of grants funded, receiving $1.2 million. This grant studied how to improve the accuracy of how people responded to questions about their sexual history.

    Read original stimulus investigation on NBCBayArea.com

    "If you honestly report on your sexual activity and number of partners?" Scott Amey asked with a sigh. "That's a good one."

    Amey is the general council for  POGO, the Project on Government Oversight, a Washington D.C. nonpartisan non-profit government watchdog group. During our interview with an NBC crew he tried to explain why the government used that many tax dollars to improve self reports about high risk sexual behavior.

    "I don't think most tax payers would think that would be a justified spending of stimulus money to conduct a sex study over fixing bridges and roads that are crumbling every day," Amey added.

    NBC Bay Area talked to the University of California San Francisco, the institution that received the grant. "Does it make you wonder a little bit, stimulus money for a study like this?" Kovaleski asked Jeff Sheehy, who works at the UCSF Aids Research Center. "No it doesn't," he answered. "Because to my mind we save money if we get better health outcomes."

    According to the grant, a good portion of the study will "Improve the accuracy of responses to questions," specifically questions about a person's sexual behavior. "Playing devil's advocate," Kovaleski said to Sheehy, "Do taxpayers need to spend $1.2 million to figure this out?""The judgment wasn't one that I was asked," Sheehy replied.

    The NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit discovered that for $1.2 million, taxpayers funded a study that included 200 videotaped interviews at $6000 per interview. Kovaleski asked Sheehy to justify the spending. "I think the average person is going to look at $1.2 million dollars to interview 200 people and say Wow!" Sheehy defended the study. "I understand people could look at it and have issues but this is research," he said.

    How many jobs did this actually create?
    Kovaleski then asked about jobs. "How many jobs did this $1.26 million create?" "Well I can't really say," Sheehy said. "There were eleven researchers hired on the job, two consultants. Well I can't say. This has not been evaluated for job creation."

    The number Sheehy quoted during an interview with NBC Bay Area did not match information on recovery.gov, the government's website for stimulus funds. According to the site, the grant produced 0.85 jobs. "It does make you scratch your head and wonder," Amey said, "Wait a second taxpayer dollars went to a sex study that barely funded less than one person."

    Amey was also left questioning another UCSF grant. When asked by an NBC reporter about a study into erectile dysfunction involving overweight middle aged men he replied, "Oh boy."

    The grant totaled more than a quarter million dollars. Although UCSF was willing to discuss our questions about the sexual history grant, the University declined to provide an expert to talk with the NBC Investigative Unit about the erectile dysfunction grant. In a written statement provided they said in part, "Obesity related health issues currently cost $147 billion per year in direct medical costs in the United States..... Health providers therefore continue to search for incentives to encourage people to live a healthier lifestyle, to benefit both indviduals and society.... Preliminary analysis indicates that is is feasible to enroll men in this type of research, they successfully lose the expected weight over a 12-week period, and they see an improvement in ED symptoms." You can read the entire statement by clicking here.

    Click here to see the high risk sexual behavior grant

    Click here to see the erectile dysfunction grant

    If you have any other examples of questionable stimulus spending, we want to know. Call us at 1-888-996-TIPS (8477) or email theunit@nbcbayarea.com.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

  • US veterans to return war medals in protest

    Narayan Mahon for msnbc.com

    Iraq War veteran Steven Acheson at his home in Platteville, Wis., on May 14, 2012.

    Iraq war veteran Steven Acheson will engage in the rarest of protests this weekend: He will hand back his military service medals at the NATO summit in Chicago, an act one veteran calls "disgraceful."

    Acheson, who served for five years in the Army, including more than a year in Iraq that he says left him with PTSD and nightmares, is taking this step to protest the "war on terror" and the force leading it, NATO. He will be joined by a few dozen veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars who are concerned about the wars' fallout on veterans and civilians alike.

    “I feel like this is a really good way for me to kind of, not clear my conscience, but just make a step in the direction of healing and kind of reconciling with the Afghan people and the Iraq people,” said Acheson, a 27-year-old college student from Wisconsin and a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, which includes soldiers who served in any of the post- 9/11 conflict zones, “… and let them know that we’re standing by their side and we’re not standing with NATO anymore. We don’t agree with the policies that are driving these wars.”

    Acheson and 30-50 fellow 9/11-era veterans will carry their medals as they lead an anti-war march this Sunday through Chicago’s downtown area to the convention center where NATO is holding its summit. President Obama and other world leaders are scheduled to be among the summit attendees, and the city of Chicago is bracing for major protests.

    Organizers are hoping the rally, which caps a week-long series of anti-NATO actions, will draw thousands. The Iraq and Afghanistan veterans will be flanked by Vietnam veterans and will hold a reconciliation ceremony with Afghans for Peace.

    They intend to carry an American flag that they will lower and replace with a white one as they approach the summit venue. They are planning to pin their medals to the American flag, which they’d like to present to NATO officials. If they’re unable to do so, they may construct an ad hoc memorial or toss the medals toward the convention center -- like some 900 Vietnam veterans did in 1971 on Capitol Hill in an anti-war protest dubbed “Operation Dewey Canyon III.”

    Barry Romo was West Coast coordinator for the Vietnam Veterans Against the War during the 1971 week-long demonstration.

    “Wives left husbands; parents said … those medals were something you should be giving the grandkids. But I mean, the level of death was just really too much for us to deal with at that time and we said, you know, if there’s a question of medals versus lives then there was no question,” he said.

    Returning the medals – even those that are given just for showing up to the theater of conflict, as are some of the ones the veterans plan to return – is not without controversy.

    “They’re as much of a disgrace as the veterans back in the Vietnam days that did the same thing,” said retired Army 1st Sgt. Troy Steward, of New York, who served 22 years and is now a military blogger. “If these veterans aren’t proud of the service that they did … then they should never have accepted them (medals) in the first place.”

    Steward, 43, who served in Afghanistan, said the action was “disgraceful and disrespectful” to others who had served. While the veterans were welcome to express their opinions, he said, there were a lot of “better ways to do it than essentially shaming your military service and your brethren.”

    Acheson will return his “Global War on Terrorism Service Medal” and the “Iraq Campaign Medal”; he is keeping others he received.

    Aaron Hughes, a 30-year-old organizer for IVAW who served six years in the Army, including 15 months in Iraq and Kuwait, also will return two medals.

    In the process of searching for a way to heal “we came to these symbols of the occupations, which are these medals that we carry around and we still have,” Hughes said. “They’re these … reminders of what we’ve done, that it’s time to let go of.”

    “I think it’s something that many of us are conflicted about, but we also feel like this is the right action to take,” he noted, adding that there was a lot of consensus on the returning of the medals. “It is a sacrifice, but it’s one that we feel is worth it.”

    But some cautioned the veterans to think carefully before handing over the medals.

    “They become almost like family heirlooms in some ways,” said Adrian Lewis, a professor specializing in 20th century warfare at the University of Kansas in Lawrence. “It's not the norm to give them back. Most folks are proud of them. They feel like they earned them and they’re indications that they served their country.”

    “They may regret it at some point ... and their family may ultimately regret it, too,” he added.

    Unlike the Vietnam War, Americans today don’t have the same outrage over the current conflicts, Lewis said.

    “Most Americans are not paying attention to the war ... they have no stake in it, no commitment to it,” he added, noting that he therefore didn’t expect the veterans’ medal protest to “be a big deal. It's not a game-changer.”

    It’s not clear how many other veterans have taken similar action. The Department of Defense, the Air Force and Army said they did not keep records on how many medals have been given back.

    "We're very proud of the service rendered by our soldiers and veterans, and they are free to do with their awards and decorations as they please," George Wright, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon, said in an e-mail.

    Acheson said the veterans don’t have high expectations for how NATO officials will receive their protest. He also noted that he was keeping some of his medals because he was proud of his service, even though he was upset that he ended up fighting in a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

    “I’m tired of seeing … fellow vets being redeployed with traumatic brain injuries and post-traumatic stress disorder, and I’m tired of seeing soldiers being deployed in general to an illegal war,” he said. “I just feel like we’ve spent enough money and enough lives over there … it’s time to come home.”

    Do you think returning war medals in protest is 'disrespectful' of other veterans?

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    Results with 503 short comments
    Total of 33,425 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments

    55.5%
    Yes
    18,549 votes
    44.5%
    No
    14,876 votes
    Display Comments:
    No

    Will Forest Gump be there to reunite with Jenny in the pond???

    • 19 votes
     - 8:51 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    free speech should allow this - it is a strong message. I support the right to protest.

    • 106 votes
     - 8:58 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    Not disrespectful in any way if you have a valid reason to do so.

    • 65 votes
     - 9:03 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    All I need is the knowledge I served my country honorably. Medals to me are like the tickets you get at Chucky Cheese for "winning" a game

    • 79 votes
     - 9:03 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    They see returning the medals as an act of healing. So be it. Ceremony and symbolism are often balms for a wounded soul.

    • 64 votes
     - 9:04 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    People who dare to go against the grain to express how they really feel. are the real heroes.

    • 81 votes
     - 9:07 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    I am a veteran of another era. Veterans do not all feel the same and he should do whatever he feels is right.

    • 89 votes
     - 9:10 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    This is an individual act of conscious. These wars have gone on much too long!

    • 70 votes
     - dmze
     - 9:11 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    His medal. His choice. I admire his choice.

    • 69 votes
     - Mo5254
     - 9:12 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    Not disrespectful..just short-sighted..u can't rewrite history..especialy ur own! Iraq was a bad idea & Afghans need an airburst warning!!

    • 13 votes
     - RicInCT
     - 9:12 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    That and 50 cents will get you a cup of coffee

    • 16 votes
     - 9:16 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    Yes

    I do. Many other vets feel the same way yet, they find better ways to voice their frustration. Besides, aren't we drawing down from the ME?

    • 18 votes
     - 9:19 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    It's time for the people to demand the maddness to stop

    • 41 votes
     - 9:20 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    That is the Freedom of Speech they fought for!

    • 62 votes
     - 9:21 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    The nation is bankrupt with these phony far away wars while the criminal globalists who have take over America keep the borders wide open.

    • 47 votes
     - 9:21 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    Who the hell am I to judge? I wasn't there. I didn't experience the atrocities these people endured. Their medals, their lives. Thanks Vets

    • 71 votes
     - 9:23 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    Iraq as we all know was based on lies. Afghanistan turned out to be more of a military industrial complex boon.

    • 45 votes
     - Rob99
     - 9:25 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    I see how they feel but if they want to return the medals they should march over to Bush or Cheney and hand them back, not Obama.

    • 45 votes
     - AngieS
     - 9:25 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    Foolish wars. Thousands of lives lost. Trillions of dollars wasted. For what again? Anybody remember? Profit? How tragic.

    • 51 votes
     - 9:29 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    It takes a very mature, braver person so say, "What I took part in was wrong." I commend these veterans for their commitment to peace.

    • 53 votes
     - 9:30 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    No it is a personal statement by these veterans. It is thier choice.

    • 30 votes
     - cgtrav
     - 9:30 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    No. 1 person's medal has nothing to do with anyone else. If I give back a medal, then that is on me. It dose not degrade another vet.

    • 37 votes
     - QE137
     - 9:30 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
    No

    They earned the right to do whatever they want with them. I will pass mine down to whomever wants them. My kids have their own already

    • 28 votes
     - 9:30 am EDT on Wed May 16, 2012
  • US has 55 daily encounters with 'suspected terrorists'

    A senior U.S. intelligence official says al-Qaida has been 'shattered' despite a just-released video tape from the group's new leader. NBC's Jim Miklaszewski reports.

    WASHINGTON - Law enforcement and homeland security personnel face an average of 55 daily encounters with "known or suspected terrorists" named on government watch lists, officials told Reuters. 

    The figure -- which equals more than 20,000 contacts per year -- underscores the growing sweep of the watchlists, which have expanded significantly since a failed Christmas Day 2009 bombing attempt of a U.S. airliner. But officials note that very few of those daily contacts lead to arrests. 


    Civil liberties groups question the use of watch lists, and they have been ridiculed for ensnaring innocent citizens. 

    U.S. officials said the encounters, which involve airport and border security personnel as well as federal and local law enforcement officers, are reported to the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC), an interagency unit led by an FBI official based in a tightly guarded building in northern Virginia. 

    NATO forces say they've captured Haji Mali Khan, a senior militant who managed operations throughout Afghanistan. NBC's Adrienne Mong reports.

    At its headquarters, the TSC operates a 24-hour command center, resembling something from a Hollywood thriller, complete with giant wall-screen projections and signs flashing "SECRET." 

    Officials said that when a law enforcement or homeland security officer in the field stops a person whose name matches a name in the TSC's databases, the officer is supposed to phone the TSC command center for instructions. Based on information in the databases, the TSC then will advise the officer in the field how to proceed, which could range from releasing the suspect to calling in federal officers as backup. 

    Probe: Scant evidence 'torture' aided war on terror
    The command center gets between 100 and 150 inquiries a day, of which an average of 55 involve individuals who turn out to be listed on one of the federal watch lists, officials said. Of those calls, about 60 percent come from federal officers at border or airport security posts; the rest come from local police. 

    "There are incidents every single day," said TSC director Timothy Healy. 

    An al-Qaida sympathizer was about to put his terror plans into action when New York City police arrested him over the weekend. Jose Pimentel, 27, was accused of plotting to bomb police and post offices in New York City. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

    The watch lists include the best known "no fly list" as well as a "selectee list" of people who the government thinks should get extra screening or questioning before being allowed to board an airplane. 

    Officials acknowledge that the number of names on these lists -- and particularly the no-fly list -- have grown considerably since Christmas Day 2009, when a Nigerian-born militant who was listed in a classified database called TIDE, but not the no-fly list, successfully boarded a U.S.-bound aircraft but then failed to detonate a bomb which Yemeni militants had helped him stash in his underpants. 

    Rules aim to give FBI custody of terrorism suspects
    American seeks political asylum in Sweden alleging torture, FBI coercion
    Bittersweet homecoming for Libyan American caught in no-fly limbo

    Before that incident, the number of names on the no-fly list was around 4,000. U.S. officials said it now contains about 20,000 names while the selectee list contains another 18,000. 

    A new threat to aviation security surfaced earlier this month, in the form of a foiled plot by al-Qaida's Yemeni affiliate to deploy a more sophisticated "underwear" bomb. 

    An online article purportedly written by al-Qaida members includes instructions on how to set fires in Montana. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

    The watchlists have been the subject of controversy - most recently last week when an 18-month-old girl and her parents were taken off a JetBlue flight when the toddler's name appeared on a no-fly security list, apparently the result of a computer glitch. 

    While the U.S. government has instituted measures to enable people to petition for their names to be deleted, officials insist that over time the lists have become more accurate. 

    Watch the Top Videos on msnbc.com

    Watchlisting officials say that airlines maintain their own lists of potentially troublesome passengers; often, they said, when a well-publicized case arises of a prominent or innocent person being denied boarding, it is because the air carrier, rather than the government, misconstrued the identity of someone on its proprietary lists. 

    One of the world's most-wanted terrorists, Anwar Al-Awlaki, has been killed in Yemen, according to local officials, dealing a damaging blow to al-Qaida and a major victory to the United States. NBC's Jim Miklaszewski reports.

    But Nusrat Choudhury, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, said her organization is pursuing legal action on behalf of people who have unjustifiably been restricted from flying. She said redress mechanisms maintained by the government are at best "ineffective." 

    Henry Kissinger gets a TSA pat-down

    Two or three of the inquiries per day turn out to be people listed on the "no fly" list, the most restrictive of the watchlists maintained by the TSC. 

    A suspect's name is put on the "no fly" list if they are deemed by government experts to be a threat to aviation, to be planning an attack or if they are "operationally capable" and are known to be planning to attend, or to have already attended, a militant training camp. 

    Fewer than 500 of the individuals on the no-fly list are U.S. citizens, officials said.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook


    Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.